• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 CT 相比,非负重足位 X 线片在跖跗关节损伤中的的测量者间和测量者内可靠性。

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of non-weight-bearing foot radiographs compared with CT in Lisfranc injuries.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Tampere, 33520, Tampere, Finland.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences and Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Teiskontie 35, PL2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03391-w. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03391-w
PMID:32140830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7505866/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injury of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint complex, known as Lisfranc injury, covers a wide range of injuries from subtle ligamentous injuries to severely displaced crush injuries. Although it is known that these injuries are commonly missed, the literature on the accuracy of the diagnostics is limited. The diagnostic accuracy of non-weight-bearing radiography (inter- or intraobserver reliability), however, has not previously been assessed among patients with Lisfranc injury.

METHODS

One hundred sets of foot radiographs acquired due to acute foot injury were collected and anonymised. The diagnosis of these patients was confirmed with a CT scan. In one-third of the radiographs, there was no Lisfranc injury; in one-third, a nondisplaced (< 2 mm) injury; and in one-third, a displaced injury. The radiographs were assessed independently by three senior orthopaedic surgeons and three orthopaedic surgery residents.

RESULTS

Fleiss kappa (κ) coefficient for interobserver reliability resulted in moderate correlation κ = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.45- 0.55) (first evaluation) and κ = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) (second evaluation). After three months, the evaluation was repeated and the Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient for intraobserver reliability showed substantial correlation κ = 0.71 (from 0.64 to 0.85). The mean (range) sensitivity was 76.1% (60.6-92.4) and specificity was 85.3% (52.9-100). The sensitivity of subtle injuries was lower than severe injuries (65.4% vs 87.1% p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of Lisfranc injury based on non-weight-bearing radiographs has moderate agreement between observers and substantial agreement between the same observer in different moments. A substantial number (24%) of injuries are missed if only non-weight-bearing radiographs are used. Nondisplaced injuries were more commonly missed than displaced injuries, and therefore, special caution should be used when the clinical signs are subtle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

跗跖关节复合体(TMT)损伤,即 Lisfranc 损伤,范围广泛,从轻微的韧带损伤到严重的粉碎性挤压伤都有。尽管人们知道这些损伤经常被漏诊,但关于诊断准确性的文献有限。然而,之前尚未评估过 Lisfranc 损伤患者的非负重位 X 线(观察者间或观察者内的可靠性)的诊断准确性。

方法

收集了 100 套因急性足部损伤而拍摄的足部 X 光片,并对其进行了匿名处理。这些患者的诊断通过 CT 扫描得到了确认。在三分之一的 X 光片中,没有 Lisfranc 损伤;三分之一为无移位(<2mm)损伤;三分之一为移位损伤。由三位资深骨科医生和三位骨科住院医生对 X 光片进行独立评估。

结果

观察者间可靠性的 Fleiss kappa(κ)系数显示出中度相关性κ=0.50(95%置信区间:0.45-0.55)(第一次评估)和κ=0.58(95%置信区间:0.52-0.63)(第二次评估)。三个月后,再次进行评估,观察者内可靠性的 Cohen's kappa(κ)系数显示出高度相关性κ=0.71(0.64-0.85)。平均(范围)敏感度为 76.1%(60.6-92.4),特异性为 85.3%(52.9-100)。轻微损伤的敏感度低于严重损伤(65.4%比 87.1%,p=0.003)。

结论

基于非负重位 X 光片诊断 Lisfranc 损伤,观察者之间的一致性为中度,同一观察者不同时间的一致性为高度。如果仅使用非负重位 X 光片,会遗漏相当数量(24%)的损伤。无移位损伤比移位损伤更常被漏诊,因此,当临床体征不明显时,应特别小心。

证据等级

III 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/7505866/5597ecd5c5a4/402_2020_3391_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/7505866/1c70d8ed3f3e/402_2020_3391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/7505866/5597ecd5c5a4/402_2020_3391_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/7505866/1c70d8ed3f3e/402_2020_3391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d8/7505866/5597ecd5c5a4/402_2020_3391_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Inter- and intraobserver reliability of non-weight-bearing foot radiographs compared with CT in Lisfranc injuries.与 CT 相比,非负重足位 X 线片在跖跗关节损伤中的的测量者间和测量者内可靠性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03391-w. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Is the diagnostic validity of conventional radiography for Lisfranc injury acceptable?常规 X 线摄影诊断 Lisfranc 损伤的准确性如何?
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Mar 1;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00608-0.
3
Lisfranc Injury Diagnosis: What Is the Diagnostic Reliability of New Radiographic Signs Using Three-dimensional CT?Lisfranc 损伤诊断:三维 CT 新技术影像学标志的诊断可靠性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2271-2278. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002657. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Lisfranc injury: Refined diagnostic methodology using weightbearing and non-weightbearing radiographs.Lisfranc 损伤:使用负重和非负重 X 线片的改良诊断方法。
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):2318-2325. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.040. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
5
Utility of weight-bearing radiographs compared to computed tomography scan for the diagnosis of subtle Lisfranc injuries in the emergency setting.在急诊情况下,与计算机断层扫描相比,负重X线片对诊断隐匿性Lisfranc损伤的效用。
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Oct;31(5):741-744. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13237. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
6
Is Pes Cavus Alignment Associated With Lisfranc Injuries of the Foot?高弓足对线与足部Lisfranc损伤有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1463-1469. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5131-6. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
7
Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review.Lisfranc 损伤的影像学表现:系统文献回顾。
Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Jan;49(1):31-53. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03282-1. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
8
Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography.用于评估寰枕关节的功率比的观察者间可靠性和观察者内可重复性:X线平片与计算机断层扫描的比较
Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr;18(4):577-82. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0877-5. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
9
Asymmetric lambda sign of the second tarsometatarsal joint on axial weight-bearing cone-beam CT scans of the foot: preliminary investigation for diagnosis of subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model.轴位负重锥形束 CT 扫描中第二跗跖关节的不对称 λ 征:尸体模型中用于诊断隐匿性跖跗关节韧带损伤的初步研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Oct;49(10):1615-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03445-5. Epub 2020 May 11.
10
The First Tarsometatarsal Joint in Lisfranc Injuries.跖跗关节在 Lisfranc 损伤中的应用。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Oct;43(10):1308-1316. doi: 10.1177/10711007221112090. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of diagnostic performance of X‑ray, CT and MRI in patients with surgically confirmed subtle Lisfranc injuries.X线、CT及MRI对手术确诊的隐匿性Lisfranc损伤患者的诊断性能比较
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Feb 29;27(4):174. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12462. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Inconsistent radiographic diagnostic criteria for lisfranc injuries: a systematic review.蔺氏骨折影像学诊断标准不一致:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 27;24(1):915. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07043-z.
3
Is the diagnostic validity of conventional radiography for Lisfranc injury acceptable?

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability, Surgeon Preferences, and Eye-Tracking Assessment of the Stress Examination of the Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) Joint Complex.跗跖(Lisfranc)关节复合体应力检查的可靠性、外科医生偏好及眼动追踪评估
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jan;58(1):93-96. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
Injury Pattern in Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries in Competitive Athletes.运动员中 Ligamentous Lisfranc 损伤的损伤模式。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Feb;40(2):185-194. doi: 10.1177/1071100718802264. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
3
Incidence and Characteristics of Midfoot Injuries.
常规 X 线摄影诊断 Lisfranc 损伤的准确性如何?
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Mar 1;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00608-0.
4
Weight-bearing cone-beam CT: the need for standardised acquisition protocols and measurements to fulfill high expectations-a review of the literature.承重锥形束 CT:为满足高期望而制定标准化采集协议和测量方法的必要性——文献综述。
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Jun;52(6):1073-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04223-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation.影响急性跖跗关节骨折脱位手术后残余间室综合征的因素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2685-2694. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04058-w. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Outcomes after nonoperatively treated non-displaced Lisfranc injury: a retrospective case series of 55 patients.未经手术治疗的无移位 Lisfranc 损伤的结果:55 例回顾性病例系列。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1311-1317. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03599-w. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
足中部损伤的发生率和特征。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):105-112. doi: 10.1177/1071100718799741. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
4
Subtle Lisfranc Injuries: A Topical Review and Modification of the Classification System.隐匿性跖跗关节损伤:专题综述及分类系统的修订
Orthopedics. 2018 Mar 1;41(2):e168-e175. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180213-07. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
5
Nonweightbearing Radiographs in Patients With a Subtle Lisfranc Injury.隐匿性Lisfranc损伤患者的非负重X线片
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Oct;38(10):1120-1125. doi: 10.1177/1071100717717220. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
6
Injury Characteristics of Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries Compared With High-Energy Injuries.低能量Lisfranc损伤与高能量损伤的损伤特征比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Sep;38(9):964-969. doi: 10.1177/1071100717709575. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Reliability of the Lisfranc injury radiological classification (Myerson-modified Hardcastle classification system).Lisfranc损伤的放射学分类(迈尔森改良的哈德卡斯尔分类系统)的可靠性。
Int Orthop. 2015 Nov;39(11):2215-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2939-8. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
Subtle lisfranc subluxation: results of operative and nonoperative treatment.轻微的 Lisfranc 半脱位:手术治疗与非手术治疗的结果
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 May-Jun;54(3):350-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.07.015. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
9
Comparing the outcomes between Chopart, Lisfranc and multiple metatarsal shaft fractures.比较Chopart骨折、Lisfranc骨折和多发跖骨干骨折的治疗结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Oct;134(10):1397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2059-8. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
10
Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.解读用于患者护理的诊断准确性研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 2;345:e3999. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3999.