Division of Urology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Urol. 2020 Sep;204(3):578-586. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001010. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Chronic kidney disease affects 25% to 50% of patients with spina bifida. Guidelines recommend kidney function surveillance in these patients but practice patterns are unknown. Variations in kidney function surveillance were assessed in patients with spina bifida based on the hypothesis that the treating clinic and spina bifida type would be associated with kidney function surveillance.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of U.S. patients in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry from 2013 to 2018. Followup was anchored at the 2013 visit. Participants with either an outcome event within 2 years of followup or more than 2 years of followup without an outcome event were included. Primary outcome was kidney function surveillance, defined as at least 1 renal ultrasound and serum creatinine within 2 years of followup. Primary exposures were clinic and spina bifida type, which were analyzed with covariates including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in logistic regression models for their association with the outcome. Sensitivity analyses were performed using different kidney function surveillance definitions.
Of 8,351 patients 5,445 were included with a median followup of 3.0 years. Across 23 treating clinics kidney function surveillance rates averaged 62% (range 6% to 100%). In multivariable models kidney function surveillance was associated with treating clinic, younger patient age, functional lesion level, nonambulatory status and prior bladder augmentation. Treating clinic remained a significant predictor of kidney function surveillance in all sensitivity analyses.
Within the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry wide variation exists in practice of kidney function surveillance across treating clinics despite adjustment for key patient characteristics.
慢性肾脏病影响 25%至 50%的脊柱裂患者。指南建议对这些患者进行肾功能监测,但目前尚不清楚实际操作情况。本研究基于以下假设评估了脊柱裂患者的肾功能监测差异,即治疗诊所和脊柱裂类型与肾功能监测相关。
对 2013 年至 2018 年期间美国国家脊柱裂患者注册中心的患者进行回顾性队列研究。随访时间以 2013 年就诊时间为基准。纳入研究对象为随访时间 2 年内出现结局事件或随访时间超过 2 年但无结局事件的患者。主要结局是肾功能监测,定义为随访时间 2 年内至少进行 1 次肾脏超声和血清肌酐检查。主要暴露因素为诊所和脊柱裂类型,采用逻辑回归模型分析协变量包括社会人口学和临床特征与结局的相关性。采用不同的肾功能监测定义进行敏感性分析。
在 8351 例患者中,5445 例患者符合纳入标准,中位随访时间为 3.0 年。在 23 家治疗诊所中,肾功能监测率平均为 62%(范围 6%至 100%)。多变量模型分析显示,肾功能监测与治疗诊所、患者年龄较小、功能损伤水平、非运动状态和既往膀胱扩张术相关。在所有敏感性分析中,治疗诊所仍然是肾功能监测的重要预测因素。
尽管对关键患者特征进行了调整,但在国家脊柱裂患者注册中心,各治疗诊所之间的肾功能监测实践存在很大差异。