• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法评估废弃塑料末端处理方案的可持续性——以挪威为例

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway.

机构信息

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, 103, Gamle Fysikk, Sem Sælands vei 5, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, 103, Gamle Fysikk, Sem Sælands vei 5, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; SINTEF Community, Høgskoleringen 7B, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 1;719:137353. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137353. Epub 2020 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137353
PMID:32143095
Abstract

Plastic, and its pollution of marine ecosystems, has emerged as a global concern. Among the several other sources, plastics from abandoned, lost, or discarded fishing gears (ALDFG), and ropes are considered the most dangerous for marine wildlife. In EU states, the management ALDFG is prioritized through a dedicated action plan owing to the hazardous nature of ALDFG and the increase in commercial fishing activity in EU waters. The action plan demands to close the loop of plastics from fishing to ensure sustainable resource management using strategies of the circular economy (CE). Commercial fishing is a crucial sector in Norway, generating 4000 tons of waste plastic annually from fishing gears and ropes. While recycling, landfilling, and incineration are the standard end-of-life management options, the recycling industry in the region is immature. The lack of recycling capacity and inadequate infrastructure results in exporting most of the recyclable fraction out of Norway for further processing. Although within the framework of CE, the transboundary export of waste for recycling misses the opportunity to create value out of waste within the region. Therefore, in the pursuit of CE strategies, it is essential to ensure regional sustainability. In this study, we assess the environmental, economic, and social impacts of landfilling, incinerating, and recycling of waste fishing gears in Norway. To represent the current state, we include two existing recycling scenarios for the assessment, namely, recycling (inland) and recycling (export). Based on qualitative and quantitative data from relevant stakeholders, we adapted multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to rank the end-of-life (EOL) alternatives through their ability to sustainably manage 4000 tons of waste plastics from fishing gears in Norway. The ranking and insights from stakeholder interaction were used to ascertain potential barriers in realizing principles of CE and to further recognize opportunities for establishing circular business models in the region.

摘要

塑料及其对海洋生态系统的污染已成为全球关注的焦点。在其他几个来源中,废弃、丢失或丢弃的渔具(ALDFG)和绳索中的塑料被认为对海洋野生动物最危险。在欧盟国家,由于 ALDFG 的危险性质以及欧盟水域商业捕鱼活动的增加,通过专门的行动计划优先管理 ALDFG。该行动计划要求从渔业中关闭塑料循环,以确保使用循环经济(CE)战略进行可持续资源管理。商业捕鱼是挪威的一个重要部门,每年从渔具和绳索中产生 4000 吨废塑料。虽然回收、填埋和焚烧是标准的寿命终结管理选择,但该地区的回收行业尚未成熟。缺乏回收能力和基础设施不足导致该地区大部分可回收部分出口到挪威以外进行进一步加工。尽管在 CE 框架内,废物的越境出口进行回收错过了在该地区从废物中创造价值的机会。因此,在追求 CE 战略时,必须确保区域可持续性。在这项研究中,我们评估了在挪威填埋、焚烧和回收废弃渔具的环境、经济和社会影响。为了代表当前的情况,我们为评估包括两种现有的回收方案,即(内陆)回收和(出口)回收。根据相关利益相关者的定性和定量数据,我们采用多标准决策分析(MCDA)来通过其可持续管理挪威 4000 吨渔具废物的能力对寿命终结(EOL)替代方案进行排名。排名和利益相关者互动的见解用于确定在实现 CE 原则方面的潜在障碍,并进一步认识到在该地区建立循环商业模式的机会。

相似文献

1
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway.多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法评估废弃塑料末端处理方案的可持续性——以挪威为例
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 1;719:137353. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137353. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
2
Comparing the end-of-life circularity potential of commercial fishing gear deployed in Norway by applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).应用多准则决策分析(MCDA)比较挪威商业捕鱼设备的临终循环潜力。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Dec;209(Pt A):117066. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117066. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
Multi-stakeholder perspective to generate evidence and strategies for sustainable management of ropes from the fishing sector of Norway.多方利益相关者视角:为挪威渔业绳索的可持续管理生成证据和策略。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2023 Dec;197:115798. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115798. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
4
End-of-life fishing gear in Spain: Quantity and recyclability.西班牙的濒死渔具:数量和可回收性。
Environ Pollut. 2023 Jan 1;316(Pt 2):120545. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120545. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Small circles: The role of physical distance in plastics recycling.小圆点:物理距离在塑料回收中的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 20;831:154913. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154913. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
A method to extract fishers' knowledge (FK) to generate evidence for sustainable management of fishing gears.一种提取渔民知识(FK)以生成渔具可持续管理证据的方法。
MethodsX. 2019 May 8;6:1044-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.05.008. eCollection 2019.
7
A comprehensive review on integrative approach for sustainable management of plastic waste and its associated externalities.关于塑料垃圾可持续管理及其相关外部性综合方法的全面综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 15;825:153973. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153973. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
The mass flow and proposed management of bisphenol A in selected Norwegian waste streams.挪威特定废物流中双酚A的质量流量及建议管理措施。
Waste Manag. 2017 Feb;60:775-785. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
9
Environmental impacts of post-consumer plastic wastes: Treatment technologies towards eco-sustainability and circular economy.消费后塑料废物的环境影响:迈向生态可持续性和循环经济的处理技术。
Chemosphere. 2022 Dec;308(Pt 1):135867. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135867. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
10
Recycling potential of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in Finland.芬兰消费后塑料包装废物的回收潜力。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jan;71:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of endemic disease prevention and control in Jiangsu Province, China, 2013-2022.中国江苏省 2013-2022 年地方病防治工作效果综合评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1271765. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1271765. eCollection 2023.
2
Integrated TOPSIS-COV approach for selecting a sustainable PET waste management technology: A case study in Qatar.用于选择可持续PET废物管理技术的集成TOPSIS-COV方法:卡塔尔的案例研究
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 23;8(8):e10274. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10274. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Transboundary movement of waste review: From binary towards a contextual framing.
跨界废物转移审查:从二元框架到情境框架。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Jan;41(1):52-67. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221105424. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Decision support system for ranking relevant indicators for reopening strategies following COVID-19 lockdowns.COVID-19封锁后重新开放策略相关指标排名的决策支持系统。
Qual Quant. 2022;56(2):463-491. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01129-3. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
5
An integrated model for evaluation of maternal health care in China.中国母婴保健评估的综合模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0245300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245300. eCollection 2021.