Suppr超能文献

随机前瞻性研究评估了单次椎旁阻滞、椎旁导管和胸椎硬膜外导管在电视辅助胸腔镜手术后的术后区域镇痛效果。

Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Jul;34(7):1870-1876. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has improved patient outcomes; however, postoperative pain remains potentially severe. The objective of this study was to compare adjunct analgesic modalities for VATS, including paravertebral nerve blockade (PVB) and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

Large academic hospital, single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing VATS.

INTERVENTIONS

Ultrasound-guided PVB catheter, ultrasound-guided single-injection PVB, or TEA.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (at rest and with knee flexion) and opioid usage were recorded. Pain scores (with movement) for the TEA group were lower than those for either PVB group at 24 hours (p ≤ 0.008) and for the PVB catheter group at 48 hours (p = 0.002). Opioid use in TEA group was lower than that for either PVB group at 24 and 48 hours (p < 0.001) and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Single-injection PVB was faster compared with PVB catheter placement (6 min v 12 min; p < 0.001) but similar to TEA (5 min). Patient satisfaction, nausea, sedation, and 6-month postsurgical pain did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TEA led to lower pain scores and opioid requirement for VATS procedures compared with PVB techniques. Single-injection PVB was faster and equally as effective as PVB catheter, and it led to similar patient satisfaction as TEA; therefore, it should be considered in patients who are not ideal candidates for TEA.

摘要

目的

电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)改善了患者的预后;然而,术后疼痛仍然可能很严重。本研究的目的是比较 VATS 的辅助镇痛方式,包括椎旁神经阻滞(PVB)和胸椎硬膜外麻醉(TEA)。

设计

前瞻性、随机试验。

地点

大型学术医院,单一机构。

参与者

接受 VATS 的成年患者。

干预措施

超声引导下 PVB 导管、超声引导下单次注射 PVB 或 TEA。

测量和主要结果

记录术后视觉模拟评分(静息时和膝关节屈曲时)和阿片类药物的使用情况。在 24 小时(p≤0.008)和 48 小时(p=0.002)时,TEA 组的疼痛评分(活动时)低于任何 PVB 组,在 48 小时时,PVB 导管组的疼痛评分(p=0.002)。TEA 组在 24 小时和 48 小时(p<0.001)和 72 小时(p<0.05)时的阿片类药物用量均低于任何 PVB 组。单次注射 PVB 与 PVB 导管放置相比(6 分钟比 12 分钟;p<0.001)更快,但与 TEA 相似(5 分钟)。各组之间的患者满意度、恶心、镇静和术后 6 个月疼痛无差异。

结论

与 PVB 技术相比,TEA 可降低 VATS 手术的疼痛评分和阿片类药物需求。单次注射 PVB 与 PVB 导管一样快速且同样有效,并且与 TEA 一样可获得相似的患者满意度;因此,对于不适合 TEA 的患者,应考虑使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验