Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 6;10(1):4246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61233-6.
Patient satisfaction with the shape and appearance of their nose after orthognathic surgery-based skeletofacial reconstruction is an important, but often overlooked, outcome. We assessed the nose-related outcomes through a recently developed patient-reported outcome instrument and a widely adopted 3D computer-based objective outcome instrument, to verify any correlation in the results produced by these tools. We collected FACE-Q nose appearance reports (2 scales) and 3D nasal morphometry (10 parameters) from patients with class III skeletal pattern and congenital cleft lip palate deformity (n = 23) or developmental dentofacial deformity (n = 23) after (>12 months) skeletofacial reconstruction. The cleft and dentofacial cohorts demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) poorer satisfaction scores with regard to the FACE-Q nostrils scale than the normal age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched subjects (n = 107), without any significant difference in FACE-Q nose scale. The cleft cohort had significantly (p < 0.001) smaller nasal length, nasal tip projection, and columellar angle and greater nasal protrusion, alar width, and columellar-labial angle values than the dentofacial and normal cohorts; however, there were no significant differences between the dentofacial versus normal cohorts. The FACE-Q nose and nostrils scales were significantly (p < 0.001; r = -0.26-0.27) correlated to the results of the 3D morphometric analysis, with regard to nasal length, alar width, columella angle, and columellar-labial angle parameters. This study revealed differences in satisfaction with the appearance of the nose according to the type of underlying deformity, and demonstrated a significant correlation (low correlation coefficients) between the patient-reports and 3D image-based outcome measure tools, which has implications for multidisciplinary-centered research, auditing, and clinical care.
患者对正颌骨重建后面部鼻部形态和外观的满意度是一个重要但常被忽视的结果。我们通过最近开发的患者报告结局评估工具和广泛采用的基于 3D 计算机的客观结局评估工具来评估与鼻部相关的结局,以验证这些工具产生的结果之间的相关性。我们收集了 23 例 III 类骨骼畸形和先天性唇腭裂畸形(n=23)或发育性牙颌面畸形(n=23)患者的 FACE-Q 鼻部外观报告(2 个量表)和 3D 鼻形态测量(10 个参数),这些患者在正颌骨重建后(>12 个月)。裂和牙颌面畸形组患者在 FACE-Q 鼻孔量表上的满意度评分明显(p<0.001)低于年龄、性别和种族匹配的正常对照组(n=107),而在 FACE-Q 鼻部量表上则没有显著差异。裂组患者的鼻长度、鼻尖突出度、鼻中隔角度和鼻突度明显较小(p<0.001),鼻翼宽度和鼻中隔唇角较大(p<0.001),而牙颌面畸形组和正常对照组之间无显著差异。FACE-Q 鼻部和鼻孔量表与 3D 形态测量分析结果显著相关(p<0.001;r=-0.26-0.27),与鼻长度、鼻翼宽度、鼻中隔角和鼻中隔唇角参数相关。本研究根据潜在畸形的类型揭示了患者对鼻部外观满意度的差异,并证实了患者报告和基于 3D 图像的结局评估工具之间存在显著相关性(低相关系数),这对多学科研究、审核和临床护理具有重要意义。