• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心回顾性分析分期腹腔灌洗治疗继发性腹膜炎患者结局。

Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Staged Peritoneal Lavage for Secondary Peritonitis.

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Minimally Invasive and Oncologic Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Rochusstr. 2, 40479, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Waldeyerstr. 1, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2185-2190. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05455-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-020-05455-9
PMID:32144471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7266858/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Secondary peritonitis is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Data on the effect of staged re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy as a surgical option in the management of abdominal sepsis due to secondary peritonitis are limited and conflicting. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients undergoing staged peritoneal lavage (SPL) for secondary peritonitis in our department.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of the data of patients undergoing SPL for secondary peritonitis. SPL was performed via either re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy. The simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) was calculated at the time of the initial operation and for each SPL. The end points of interest included: the evolution of sepsis characterized by the SAPS II score, the mortality rate and the rate of definitive abdominal wall closure.

RESULTS

The data of 74 patients with a median age of 73 years requiring at least one SPL between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed. The median number of SPL performed was three (range 1-12). A sequential drop of SAPS II score from 41 at the initial procedure to 32 at the third SPL was documented. The overall mortality rate was 16.2%, definitive abdominal closure was achieved in all surviving patients and the median length of stay was 17.5d CONCLUSION: Staged re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage may reduce the severity of peritonitis and reduce the risk of mortality in patients with abdominal sepsis. Maintaining the abdominal wall under constant retraction using a rigid mesh while creating an open abdomen is a crucial step in achieving definite abdominal wall closure. Thus, staged peritoneal lavage may be a good surgical option for selected patients with peritonitis.

摘要

背景

继发性腹膜炎与高发病率和死亡率相关。关于分期剖腹术或剖腹再腹腔镜检查作为治疗继发性腹膜炎引起的腹部脓毒症的手术选择的效果的数据有限且存在冲突。在此,我们报告了我们科室接受分期腹膜灌洗(SPL)治疗继发性腹膜炎的患者的结局。

方法

这是一项对因继发性腹膜炎接受 SPL 的患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。SPL 通过剖腹术或剖腹再腹腔镜检查进行。在初次手术和每次 SPL 时计算简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)。感兴趣的终点包括:以 SAPS II 评分特征的脓毒症演变、死亡率和确定性腹壁闭合率。

结果

分析了 2012 年至 2019 年期间至少需要进行一次 SPL 的 74 例中位年龄为 73 岁的患者的数据。中位数 SPL 次数为 3 次(范围 1-12 次)。从初次手术的 41 分记录到第 3 次 SPL 的 32 分,SAPS II 评分呈连续下降。总的死亡率为 16.2%,所有存活患者均实现了确定性腹壁闭合,中位住院时间为 17.5d。

结论

分期剖腹术或剖腹再腹腔镜检查联合腹膜灌洗可能降低腹膜炎的严重程度,并降低腹部脓毒症患者的死亡率。在创建开放性腹部的同时使用刚性网持续牵拉腹壁是实现确定性腹壁闭合的关键步骤。因此,分期腹膜灌洗可能是治疗腹膜炎患者的一种较好的手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/f4048ea88691/268_2020_5455_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/7858613dde32/268_2020_5455_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/7af5a0923377/268_2020_5455_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/e71adb75eda5/268_2020_5455_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/b4390174f2b5/268_2020_5455_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/f4048ea88691/268_2020_5455_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/7858613dde32/268_2020_5455_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/7af5a0923377/268_2020_5455_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/e71adb75eda5/268_2020_5455_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/b4390174f2b5/268_2020_5455_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b163/7266858/f4048ea88691/268_2020_5455_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Staged Peritoneal Lavage for Secondary Peritonitis.单中心回顾性分析分期腹腔灌洗治疗继发性腹膜炎患者结局。
World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2185-2190. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05455-9.
2
Transverse vs. median laparotomy in peritonitis and staged lavage: a single center case series.横切口与正中切口在腹膜炎和分期灌洗中的比较:单中心病例系列。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Sep 14;18:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/000283. eCollection 2020.
3
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗术与手术切除治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;21(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Staged lavage versus single high-volume lavage in the treatment of feculent/purulent peritonitis: a matched pair analysis.分期灌洗与单次大容量灌洗治疗粪性/脓性腹膜炎的配对分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Mar;394(2):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0444-x. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
5
Staged peritoneal lavages with the aid of a Zipper system in the treatment of diffuse peritonitis.借助拉链系统进行分期腹膜灌洗治疗弥漫性腹膜炎。
Acta Chir Belg. 1994 May-Jun;94(3):176-9.
6
Role of zipper in the management of abdominal sepsis.拉链在腹部脓毒症管理中的作用。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 1993 Jan;12(1):1-4.
7
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey III diverticulitis: is it as effective as it is applicable?腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗治疗欣奇 III 级憩室炎:其适用性与有效性是否相当?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1384-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000252.
8
Novel approach to intraoperative peritoneal lavage with an extracorporeal stirring method in laparoscopic surgery for generalized peritonitis: Preliminary results.腹腔镜手术治疗弥漫性腹膜炎时采用体外搅拌法进行术中腹腔灌洗的新方法:初步结果
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jan;13(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/ases.12685. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis.腹腔镜下腹腔灌洗术治疗因憩室炎穿孔所致的弥漫性腹膜炎。
Br J Surg. 2008 Jan;95(1):97-101. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6024.
10
[Laparoscopic staged lavage in CAPD catheter peritonitis--an alternative to open treatment?].[腹腔镜分期灌洗治疗持续性非卧床腹膜透析导管相关性腹膜炎——开放手术治疗的替代方案?]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1188-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Tricky acute mesenteric ischemia: what can we do?棘手的急性肠系膜缺血:我们能做些什么?
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2025 Jul 7;13:goaf067. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaf067. eCollection 2025.
2
Transverse vs. median laparotomy in peritonitis and staged lavage: a single center case series.横切口与正中切口在腹膜炎和分期灌洗中的比较:单中心病例系列。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Sep 14;18:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/000283. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.从全球视角看腹腔内感染的管理:2017 年 WSES 腹腔内感染管理指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Jul 10;12:29. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6. eCollection 2017.
2
Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) and elderly population: prognostic evaluation in acute secondary peritonitis.曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)与老年人群:急性继发性腹膜炎的预后评估
G Chir. 2016 Nov-Dec;37(6):243-249. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.6.243.
3
Risk factors for mortality in postoperative peritonitis in critically ill patients.
危重症患者术后腹膜炎死亡的危险因素
World J Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 4;6(1):48-55. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.48.
4
Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit.SAPS II和APACHE II评分系统对内科重症监护病房患者预后的预测价值。
Acta Med Acad. 2016 Nov;45(2):97-103. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.165.
5
The Role of Planned and On-Demand Relaparotomy in the Developing World.计划性和按需再次剖腹术在发展中国家的作用
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1558-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3379-8.
6
Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis : A continuing problem.继发性腹膜炎的外科治疗:一个持续存在的问题。
Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0121-x.
7
Scoring Systems in Assessing Survival of Critically Ill ICU Patients.评估重症监护病房(ICU)重症患者生存率的评分系统
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Sep 4;21:2621-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894153.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.非创伤患者开放性腹部及临时腹部关闭技术的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2015 Apr;39(4):912-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6.
9
Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV.穿孔性憩室炎 Hinchey III/IV 患者行腹部真空和延迟肠重建的损伤控制性手术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1915-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1977-4. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
10
The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems--historical evolution and systematic review.开放性腹部和临时腹部闭合系统——历史演变和系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):e429-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03045.x.