Department of Radiology, KyungHee University Medical Center, KyungHee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, 110-744, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;31(2):401-408. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00887-1. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
The aim was to monitor aneurysms that show imaging evidence of minor recanalization 36 months after coil embolization and to determine the rate and related risk factors of major recanalization during more prolonged observation.
A total of 54 patients with 55 aneurysms showing minor recanalization at 36-month follow-up imaging between 2011 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Medical records and radiological data accumulating in the course of extended monitoring (mean 83.9 ± 21.5 months) were assessed. Incidence and average annual risk of progression to major recanalization were then calculated. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to determine possible risk factors for progression to major recanalization.
In the 55 aneurysms studied 26 showed sustained minor recanalization since month 6 of follow-up, whereas minor recanalization of 29 completely occluded coiled lesions appeared in follow-up images after 6-24 months. Only 8 coiled aneurysms (14.5%) with minor recanalization at 36 months progressed to major recanalization during 219.3 aneurysm-years of observation (3.6% per aneurysm-year), 2 surfacing within 72 months and 6 developing thereafter. Additional embolization was performed in six of these patients. By multivariate analysis, no clinical or anatomic factors were statistically linked to such progression, but younger age showed marginal significance (hazard ratio, HR = 1.076; p = 0.099).
Most coiled aneurysms (85.5%) showing minor recanalization at 36 months postembolization proved to be stable in extended observation. Given the low probability but seriousness of delayed major recanalization, careful monitoring is still warranted in this setting but at less frequent intervals (every 2-3 years) beyond 36 months.
本研究旨在监测 coil embolization 后 36 个月出现影像学提示轻微再通的动脉瘤,并确定在更长时间观察期间出现明显再通的比例及其相关危险因素。
回顾性分析 2011 年至 2013 年间 coil embolization 后 36 个月影像学显示轻微再通的 55 个动脉瘤(共 54 例患者)。评估了在延长监测过程中积累的病历和影像学资料(平均 83.9±21.5 个月)。然后计算明显再通的发生率和平均年进展风险。应用单变量和多变量回归分析确定明显再通的可能危险因素。
在所研究的 55 个动脉瘤中,有 26 个从随访第 6 个月开始持续存在轻微再通,而 29 个 coil 栓塞病变的轻微再通在 6-24 个月的随访图像中完全闭塞。只有 8 个 coil 栓塞的动脉瘤(14.5%)在 36 个月时有轻微再通,在 219.3 个动脉瘤年的观察期内进展为明显再通(每动脉瘤年 3.6%),其中 2 个在 72 个月内出现,6 个在之后出现。在这 6 例患者中,有 4 例进行了额外的栓塞治疗。多变量分析显示,没有临床或解剖因素与这种进展有统计学联系,但年龄较轻具有边缘显著性(风险比,HR=1.076;p=0.099)。
coil embolization 后 36 个月出现轻微再通的大多数 coil 栓塞动脉瘤(85.5%)在延长观察中表现稳定。鉴于明显再通的概率较低但后果严重,在这种情况下仍需要仔细监测,但在 36 个月后可以减少监测频率(每 2-3 年一次)。