Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Third Affiliated of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):669-679. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09726-5.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been increasingly studied in treating treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but the findings have been mixed. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive VNS for TRD. Controlled studies reporting on the efficacy and safety of adjunctive VNS for TRD were screened, identified and analyzed. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed using RevMan version 5.3. Three controlled studies with a total of 1048 patients with TRD compared VNS (n = 622) with control (n = 426) groups. Only one study was rated as 'high quality' using the Jadad scale. Adjunctive VNS was significantly superior to the control group regarding study-defined response [SMD:1.96 (95%CI:1.60, 2.40), P < 0.00001, I = 0%]. Patient-reported voice alteration occurred more frequently with adjunctive VNS for patients with TRD. No significant group differences were found regarding discontinuation due to any reason [RR:0.50 (95%CI:0.12, 2.09), P = 0.34, I = 85%]. Adjunctive VNS appeared to be effective and relatively safe treatment for TRD. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of VNS for TRD.
迷走神经刺激(VNS)在治疗治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)方面的研究越来越多,但结果喜忧参半。本更新的荟萃分析旨在检查辅助 VNS 治疗 TRD 的疗效和安全性。筛选、确定和分析了报告辅助 VNS 治疗 TRD 的疗效和安全性的对照研究。使用 RevMan 版本 5.3 分析标准化均数差(SMD)、风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。三项对照研究共纳入 1048 例 TRD 患者,比较 VNS(n=622)与对照组(n=426)。只有一项研究使用 Jadad 量表被评为“高质量”。辅助 VNS 在研究定义的反应方面明显优于对照组[SMD:1.96(95%CI:1.60,2.40),P<0.00001,I=0%]。TRD 患者接受辅助 VNS 治疗后更常出现声音改变。两组因任何原因停药的发生率无显著差异[RR:0.50(95%CI:0.12,2.09),P=0.34,I=85%]。辅助 VNS 似乎是治疗 TRD 的有效且相对安全的方法。需要进一步的随机对照试验来证实 VNS 治疗 TRD 的疗效和安全性。