International Center for the Assessment of Nutritional Status (ICANS), Department of Food Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Obesity Unit and Laboratory of Nutrition and Obesity Research, IRCCS (Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare) Italian Auxologic Institute (IAI), Milan, Italy.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 May 1;111(5):983-996. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa009.
Knowledge on resting energy expenditure (REE) in spinal muscular atrophy type I (SMAI) is still limited. The lack of a population-specific REE equation has led to poor nutritional support and impairment of nutritional status.
To identify the best predictors of measured REE (mREE) among simple bedside parameters, to include these predictors in population-specific equations, and to compare such models with the common predictive equations.
Demographic, clinical, anthropometric, and treatment variables were examined as potential predictors of mREE by indirect calorimetry (IC) in 122 SMAI children consecutively enrolled in an ongoing longitudinal observational study. Parameters predicting REE were identified, and prespecified linear regression models adjusted for nusinersen treatment (discrete: 0 = no; 1 = yes) were used to develop predictive equations, separately in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.
In naïve patients, the median (25th, 75th percentile) mREE was 480 (412, 575) compared with 394 (281, 554) kcal/d in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients, respectively (P = 0.009).In nusinersen-treated patients, the median (25th, 75th percentile) mREE was 609 (592, 702) compared with 639 (479, 723) kcal/d in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients, respectively (P = 0.949).Both in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients, the best prediction of REE was obtained from 3 models, all using as predictors: 1 body size related measurement and nusinersen treatment status. Nusinersen treatment was correlated with higher REE both in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients. The population-specific equations showed a lower interindividual variability of the bias than the other equation tested, however, they showed a high root mean squared error.
We demonstrated that ventilatory status, nusinersen treatment, demographic, and anthropometric characteristics determine energy requirements in SMAI. Our SMAI-specific equations include variables available in clinical practice and were generally more accurate than previously published equations. At the individual level, however, IC is strongly recommended for assessing energy requirements. Further research is needed to externally validate these predictive equations.
关于脊髓性肌萎缩症 I 型(SMAI)静息能量消耗(REE)的知识仍然有限。由于缺乏特定人群的 REE 方程,导致营养支持不足和营养状况受损。
确定通过间接热量测定法(IC)测量的 REE(mREE)的最佳预测指标,将这些预测指标纳入特定人群的方程中,并比较这些模型与常用预测方程的差异。
对 122 例连续纳入正在进行的纵向观察性研究的 SMAI 患儿的人口统计学、临床、人体测量和治疗变量进行检查,这些变量可能通过 IC 作为 REE 的潜在预测指标。确定预测 REE 的参数,并针对诺西那生钠治疗(离散:0=无;1=有)使用预设的线性回归模型分别为自主呼吸和机械通气患者开发预测方程。
在未接受治疗的患者中,mREE 的中位数(25 百分位,75 百分位)为 480(412,575)kcal/d,与自主呼吸和机械通气患者的 394(281,554)kcal/d 相比,差异有统计学意义(P=0.009)。在接受诺西那生钠治疗的患者中,mREE 的中位数(25 百分位,75 百分位)为 609(592,702)kcal/d,与自主呼吸和机械通气患者的 639(479,723)kcal/d 相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.949)。在自主呼吸和机械通气患者中,最佳 REE 预测模型均使用 3 个指标,包括:1 个体尺寸相关测量值和诺西那生钠治疗状态。诺西那生钠治疗与自主呼吸和机械通气患者的 REE 升高相关。与其他测试的方程相比,特定人群的方程显示出较低的个体间偏差变异性,但它们的均方根误差较高。
我们证明了通气状态、诺西那生钠治疗、人口统计学和人体测量特征决定了 SMAI 的能量需求。我们的 SMAI 特异性方程包括临床实践中可用的变量,通常比以前发表的方程更准确。然而,在个体水平上,强烈推荐使用 IC 来评估能量需求。需要进一步的研究来对外验证这些预测方程。