American thyroid association guidelines are inconsistent with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations-A meta-epidemiologic study.

OBJECTIVES

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) working group has recognized some scenarios in which strong recommendations may be supported by low-quality evidence, the so-called paradigmatic situations. The adherence to these paradigmatic situations by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, however, remains unknown.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Clinical guidelines from the ATA were retrieved and deemed eligible if created using GRADE or the American College of Physicians (ACP) system. Reviewers, independently and in duplicate, assessed all strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence and judged their alignment with GRADE paradigmatic situations. The study was conducted at KER Unit Mexico.

RESULTS

A total of five clinical guidelines, one using the GRADE and four using the ACP system, were eligible for analysis. We assessed a total of 518 recommendations, of which 355 (69%) were labeled as "strong" and 163 (31%) as "weak". A total of 151 strong recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, of which 36 (24%) were congruent with one of the five GRADE paradigmatic situations, whereas 115 (76%) were not consistent with any paradigmatic situations and should have been categorized as weak (23% [26/115]) or best-practice recommendations (77% [89/115]).

CONCLUSION

ATA clinical guidelines are discordant with GRADE guidance. Future guidelines should carefully evaluate the quality of evidence and recognize its limitations when developing recommendations.