Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验中儿科阑尾炎研究结果的统计学意义的脆弱性:系统评价。

The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials in pediatric appendicitis: A systematic review.

机构信息

McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of Pediatric General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Pediatric General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2020 May;55(5):800-804. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) in pediatric appendicitis remain limited, and the robustness of available evidence is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the fragility of results in pediatric appendicitis RCTs.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase and MEDLINE was performed. Eligible studies were two-armed RCTs that included at least one statistically significant dichotomous outcome, had parallel-group allocation, and assessed pediatric patients (0-17) with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis. The Fragility Index (FI) for one statistically significant outcome per trial was calculated using a Fisher's exact test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Six studies were identified for inclusion. Studies included a median of 103 patients (interquartile range [IQR] 86-127), with a median of 18 (IQR 4.5-41.25) events for analyzed outcomes. The primary outcome variable was included in analysis for 4(67%) studies. The median FI across studies was 3 (IQR 0.75-4.25), with results ranging from 0 to 5. Results indicate that overall, converting 3 patients from non-events to events in a single trial arm would change the significant dichotomous outcome to nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

The fragility of results in RCTs in pediatric appendicitis should be considered before clinical practice is changed. Investigators should consider reporting the FI alongside study results, as p-values alone may be misleading.

TYPE OF STUDY

Randomized Controlled Trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

摘要

目的

儿科阑尾炎的随机对照试验(RCT)仍然有限,并且现有证据的稳健性尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定儿科阑尾炎 RCT 结果的脆弱性。

方法

对 Embase 和 MEDLINE 进行系统检索。合格的研究是两项双臂 RCT,至少有一项具有统计学意义的二分类结局,采用平行组分配,并评估了主要诊断为阑尾炎的儿科患者(0-17 岁)。使用 Fisher 精确检验计算每个试验一个具有统计学意义的结果的脆弱指数(FI),统计显著性设为 p < 0.05。

结果

确定了 6 项研究纳入。研究纳入的患者中位数为 103 例(四分位距 [IQR] 86-127),分析结局的中位数为 18 例(IQR 4.5-41.25)。4(67%)项研究纳入了主要结局变量进行分析。研究间的中位数 FI 为 3(IQR 0.75-4.25),结果范围为 0 至 5。结果表明,总体而言,将单个试验臂中的 3 例非事件转换为事件会将显著的二分类结局变为不显著。

结论

在改变临床实践之前,应考虑儿科阑尾炎 RCT 结果的脆弱性。研究人员应考虑与研究结果一起报告 FI,因为仅凭 p 值可能会产生误导。

研究类型

随机对照试验。

证据水平

I 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验