Guo R X, Du J M, Wang P R, Li B J, Li L X, Wang Q, Bai J
Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):112-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.010.
To investigate the surgical complications in the treatment of stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer by robotic-assisted laparoscopy, the risk degree of Clavein-Dindo complications and the main risk factors affecting the occurrence of surgical complications. A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2014 to June 2019. The patients were divided into robotic-assisted laparoscopy group and traditional laparoscopy group according to the operation mode, including 131 cases in robot group and 290 cases in traditional laparoscopy group. To compare the complications during and after operation and the risk degree of complications between the two groups by Clavein-Dindo classification standard, the age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, past history of pelvic surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, preoperative anemia, number of pelvic lymph node resection, number of abdominal aortic lymph node resection, the total number of lymph node resection, operation time, surgical methods (robot surgery or traditional laparoscopic surgery) and other clinicopathological data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. (1) Complications of operation: the incidence of operative complications (including intraoperative and postoperative complications) in robot group was significantly lower than that in traditional laparoscopy group [(20.6%, 27/131) vs (34.8%, 101/290); χ(2)=8.620, =0.003)]. The incidence of intraoperative complications in robot group was lower than that in traditional laparoscopy group [1.5% (2/131) vs 6.2% (18/290); χ(2)=4.368, =0.037]. The incidence of intraoperative vascular injury in robot group was significantly lower than that in traditional laparoscopy group [0.8% (1/131) vs 5.2% (15/290); χ(2)=4.798, =0.022]. The incidence of postoperative complications in robot group was also lower than that in traditional laparoscopy group [19.1% (25/131) vs 28.6% (83/290); χ(2)=4.303, =0.038], but the incidence of postoperative lymphatic leakage in robot group was higher than that in traditional laparoscopy group [10.7% (14/131) vs 5.2% (15/290); χ(2)=4.279, =0.039]. (2) Clavein-Dindo classification: the incidence of Clavein-Dindo Ⅰ, Ⅲ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ grade between two groups were respectively 3.8% (5/131) vs 11.0% (32/290), 13.7% (18/131) vs 14.5% (42/290), 3.1% (4/131) vs 8.6% (25/290), 0 (0/131) vs 0.3% (1/290), 0 (0/131) vs 0.3% (1/290), and the incidence of grade Ⅰ (χ(2)=5.684, =0.015) and Ⅲ (χ(2)=4.361, =0.037) complications were statistically significant. The incidence of severe complications in robot group (grade Ⅲ and above) was lower than that in traditional laparoscopy group [3.1% (4/131) vs 9.3% (27/290); χ(2)=5.179, =0.023]. (3) Analysis of influencing factors of surgical complications: univariate analysis showed that BMI (χ(2)=15.801, =0.000), preoperative anemia (χ(2)=14.299, =0.000), total number of lymph node resection (χ(2)=10.425, =0.001), surgical methods (χ(2)=8.620, =0.003) were related to the occurrence of surgical complications of endometrial carcinoma. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI (=0.289, 95%: 0.097-0.864, =0.026), preoperative anemia (=0.309, 95%: 0.129-0.740, =0.008), the total number of lymph node resection (=0.624, 95%: 0.403-0.966, =0.034) and surgical methods (=3.491, 95%: 1.030-11.840, =0.045) were independent risk factors for surgical complications of endometrial carcinoma. Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has fewer complications and lower incidence of severe complications. BMI, preoperative anemia, the total number of lymph node resection and surgical methods are independent risk factors for the occurrence of surgical complications of stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer.
为探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌的手术并发症、Clavien-Dindo并发症风险程度及影响手术并发症发生的主要危险因素。于2014年10月至2019年6月在郑州大学第一附属医院进行一项回顾性病例对照研究。根据手术方式将患者分为机器人辅助腹腔镜组和传统腹腔镜组,机器人组131例,传统腹腔镜组290例。采用Clavien-Dindo分类标准比较两组手术中和术后并发症及并发症风险程度,通过logistic回归分析年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、盆腔手术既往史、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、术前贫血、盆腔淋巴结切除数量、腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除数量、淋巴结切除总数、手术时间、手术方式(机器人手术或传统腹腔镜手术)等临床病理资料。(1)手术并发症:机器人组手术并发症(包括术中及术后并发症)发生率显著低于传统腹腔镜组[(20.6%,27/131) vs (34.8%,101/290);χ²=8.620,P=0.003]。机器人组术中并发症发生率低于传统腹腔镜组[1.5%(2/131) vs 6.2%(18/290);χ²=4.368,P=0.037]。机器人组术中血管损伤发生率显著低于传统腹腔镜组[0.8%(1/131) vs 5.2%(15/290);χ²=4.798,P=0.022]。机器人组术后并发症发生率也低于传统腹腔镜组[19.1%(25/131) vs 28.6%(83/290);χ²=4.303,P=0.038],但机器人组术后淋巴漏发生率高于传统腹腔镜组[10.7%(14/131) vs 5.2%(15/290);χ²=4.279,P=0.039]。(2)Clavien-Dindo分类:两组Clavien-DindoⅠ、Ⅲ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ级发生率分别为3.8%(5/131) vs 11.0%(32/290)、13.7%(18/131) vs 14.5%(42/290)、3.1%(4/131) vs 8.6%(25/290)、0(0/131) vs 0.3%(1/290)、0(0/131) vs 0.3%(1/290),Ⅰ级(χ²=5.684,P=0.015)和Ⅲ级(χ²=4.361,P=0.037)并发症发生率差异有统计学意义。机器人组严重并发症(Ⅲ级及以上)发生率低于传统腹腔镜组[3.1%(4/131) vs 9.3%(27/290);χ²=5.179,P=0.023]。(3)手术并发症影响因素分析:单因素分析显示BMI(χ²=15.801,P=0.000)、术前贫血(χ²=14.299,P=0.000)、淋巴结切除总数(χ²=10.425,P=0.001)、手术方式(χ²=8.620,P=0.003)与子宫内膜癌手术并发症发生有关。多因素分析显示BMI(β=0.289,95%CI:0.097-0.864,P=0.026)、术前贫血(β=0.309,95%CI:0.129-0.740,P=0.008)、淋巴结切除总数(β=0.624,95%CI:0.403-0.966,P=0.034)和手术方式(β=3.491,95%CI:1.030-11.840,P=0.045)是子宫内膜癌手术并发症的独立危险因素。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术并发症更少,严重并发症发生率更低。BMI、术前贫血、淋巴结切除总数和手术方式是Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌手术并发症发生的独立危险因素。