Staff Office of Research, BG Hospital Bergmannstrost, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Department of Sport and Motion Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Biomech. 2020 Apr 16;103:109694. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109694. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
Muscle architecture parameters change when the muscle changes in length. This has multiple effects on the function of the muscle, e.g. on force production and on contraction velocity. Here we present a versatile geometrical model that predicts changes in muscle architecture as a consequence of length changes of the muscle on the basis of the known architecture at a given muscle length. The model accounts for small changes in aponeuroses' dimensions relative to changes in fascicle length and keeps muscle volume constant. We evaluate the model on the rabbit soleus muscle by comparing model predictions of fascicle lengths and pennation angles with experimental data. For this, we determined the internal architecture of the soleus muscle at different muscle belly lengths (67.8 mm at 35° ankle angle and 59.3 mm at 80° ankle angle). The long and the short soleus muscle exhibited mean fascicle lengths and pennation angles of 20.8 ± 1.3 mm, 4 ± 2° and 13.5 ± 1 mm, 10 ± 4°, respectively. The model predicted reasonable mean fascicle lengths and pennation angles for the long and short soleus that differed only by 1 mm and 1° from the measured data, respectively. Differences between predicted and measured distributions seem to stem from interindividual variability in muscle architecture. Even if the proposed approach has been used for the soleus muscle, which is relatively simple in architecture, it is not restricted to homogeneous unipennate architectures.
当肌肉长度发生变化时,肌肉的结构参数会发生变化。这会对肌肉的功能产生多种影响,例如产生力量和收缩速度。在这里,我们提出了一种通用的几何模型,该模型可以根据给定肌肉长度下的已知结构来预测肌肉长度变化对肌肉结构的影响。该模型考虑了腱膜尺寸相对于肌束长度变化的微小变化,并保持肌肉体积恒定。我们通过将模型预测的肌束长度和羽状角与实验数据进行比较,在兔比目鱼肌上评估了该模型。为此,我们在不同的肌腹长度下(35°踝角时为 67.8mm,80°踝角时为 59.3mm)确定了比目鱼肌的内部结构。长比目鱼肌和短比目鱼肌的平均肌束长度和羽状角分别为 20.8±1.3mm、4±2°和 13.5±1mm、10±4°。该模型预测的长比目鱼肌和短比目鱼肌的平均肌束长度和羽状角与测量数据相差仅 1mm 和 1°,分别。预测值与实测值之间的差异似乎源于肌肉结构的个体间变异性。即使该方法已用于结构相对简单的比目鱼肌,但它并不限于同质单羽状结构。