Suppr超能文献

评估 4 种不同的奶牛乳房消毒方法,以用于采集牛奶样本进行细菌培养。

Evaluation of 4 different teat disinfection methods prior to collection of milk samples for bacterial culture in dairy cattle.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4579-4587. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17338. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Abstract

The first objective of this study was to determine whether differences would occur among teat end preparation techniques with regard to potential contamination of milk samples collected for bacterial culture. The second objective was to determine whether differences would be detected in genus or species of bacteria isolated from samples collected using the various methods as well as from contaminated or uncontaminated samples. Mammary quarter foremilk samples were collected from lactating dairy cattle at the University of Missouri Foremost Research Dairy Farm (Columbia). Four different teat end preparation methods were used to compare contamination rates in milk samples. Sampling techniques used before milk collection included (1) no preparation, (2) pre-milking disinfection and single-use towel drying of teats only, (3) scrubbing of the teat end with alcohol only, and (4) pre-milking disinfection, single-use towel drying, and scrubbing of the teat end with alcohol. Milk was plated on Columbia blood agar. Cultures were read at 48 h, with the number of morphologically different bacterial colony types quantified and isolated. Isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Median numbers of colony types were compared among groups using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with post-hoc pairwise comparisons, and proportional data were compared using the chi-squared test. A total of 168 cows, including 665 quarters, were sampled, and 1,614 isolates resulted. Analysis with MALDI-TOF identified 29 unique genera and 81 unique species among the samples. More contaminated samples occurred in groups 1 and 2 compared with groups 3 and 4. Group 3 had more contaminated samples than group 4. The majority of Pseudomonas spp. isolates were identified within group 2. When applying previously described niches to Staphylococcus spp., environmental species were more likely to be identified among contaminated samples, whereas host-adapted species were more likely to be identified among uncontaminated samples. These data confirm that scrubbing the teat end with alcohol after pre-milking disinfection with an iodine-based teat disinfectant and drying of the teat minimizes contamination of the milk sample.

摘要

本研究的首要目标是确定在进行细菌培养的牛奶样本采集时,不同的乳头末端准备技术之间是否会存在差异。第二个目标是确定使用各种方法采集的样本以及污染或未污染的样本中分离出的细菌的属或种是否存在差异。弗雷斯诺研究奶牛场(哥伦比亚)的泌乳奶牛采集了四个不同的乳头末端准备方法来比较牛奶样本的污染率。在采集牛奶之前使用的采样技术包括:(1)不准备,(2)挤奶前消毒和仅用一次性毛巾擦干乳头,(3)仅用酒精擦拭乳头末端,以及(4)挤奶前消毒、仅用一次性毛巾擦干乳头和用酒精擦拭乳头末端。牛奶在哥伦比亚血琼脂平板上进行接种。在 48 小时读取培养物,定量和分离形态不同的细菌菌落类型。使用 MALDI-TOF 质谱法对分离株进行鉴定。使用 Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA 检验进行组间中位数比较,并用事后两两比较,比例数据用卡方检验进行比较。共采样 168 头奶牛,包括 665 个乳房,共获得 1614 个分离株。用 MALDI-TOF 分析鉴定了样品中 29 个独特的属和 81 个独特的种。与第 3 组和第 4 组相比,第 1 组和第 2 组的污染样本更多。第 3 组比第 4 组污染样本更多。大多数假单胞菌属分离株鉴定为第 2 组。当将先前描述的生态位应用于葡萄球菌属时,污染样本中更有可能鉴定出环境种,而未污染样本中更有可能鉴定出宿主适应种。这些数据证实,在使用基于碘的乳头消毒剂进行挤奶前消毒后,用酒精擦拭乳头末端并擦干乳头可最大程度地减少牛奶样本的污染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验