• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极度肥胖患者经胫骨入路行腹股沟上栓塞术

Tibial access for supra-inguinal embolization in extremely obese patients.

作者信息

Smith Jason C, Cho Alex L, Fujimoto Scott T

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.

出版信息

CVIR Endovasc. 2020 Mar 9;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00105-6.

DOI:10.1186/s42155-020-00105-6
PMID:32147759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7061097/
Abstract

Extreme obesity is a risk factor for hemorrhagic complications of femoral access (FA). Femoral lines, hematomas, pelvic binders and coagulopathy in the trauma scenario may also add difficulty and/or risk to FA. Radial access (RA) for routine peripheral endovascular procedures has been popularized owing to decreased hemorrhagic complications, increased patient satisfaction, and decreased operator radiation dose. However, though uncommon, cerebrovascular complications from RA approach are a known risk. Relatively recently, tibial access (TA) has been used for lower extremity peripheral vascular disease interventions. The advantages of TA mirror that of RA, with few and mostly minor complications, and the risk of iatrogenic cerebral embolization is nil. We report the feasibility of TA for supra-inguinal embolization in two extremely obese patients {body mass index > 40 kg/m} following motor vehicle accidents. Commercially available base and microcatheters were used to perform embolization of the affected lower abdominal or pelvic arteries in standard fashion via a novel trans-tibial artery approach.

摘要

极度肥胖是股动脉入路(FA)出血并发症的一个危险因素。创伤情况下的股动脉置管、血肿、骨盆固定器和凝血功能障碍也可能增加FA的难度和/或风险。由于出血并发症减少、患者满意度提高以及术者辐射剂量降低,桡动脉入路(RA)在常规外周血管腔内手术中已得到普及。然而,尽管罕见,但RA入路导致的脑血管并发症是已知的风险。相对较近,胫动脉入路(TA)已用于下肢外周血管疾病的干预。TA的优点与RA相似,并发症少且大多较轻微,并且不存在医源性脑栓塞的风险。我们报告了在两名机动车事故后极度肥胖患者(体重指数>40kg/m²)中行TA进行腹股沟上栓塞的可行性。使用市售的导管座和微导管,通过一种新颖的经胫动脉途径以标准方式对受影响的下腹部或盆腔动脉进行栓塞。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/ee1cd6d49ab4/42155_2020_105_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/33ebb5ca1751/42155_2020_105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/282355d0e510/42155_2020_105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/c0079c1dec82/42155_2020_105_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/ee1cd6d49ab4/42155_2020_105_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/33ebb5ca1751/42155_2020_105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/282355d0e510/42155_2020_105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/c0079c1dec82/42155_2020_105_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/7061097/ee1cd6d49ab4/42155_2020_105_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Tibial access for supra-inguinal embolization in extremely obese patients.极度肥胖患者经胫骨入路行腹股沟上栓塞术
CVIR Endovasc. 2020 Mar 9;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00105-6.
2
Transradial access for visceral endovascular interventions in morbidly obese patients: safety and feasibility.病态肥胖患者内脏血管内介入治疗的经桡动脉入路:安全性与可行性。
J Vasc Access. 2016 May 7;17(3):256-60. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000530. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
3
Radial Approach for Left Gastric Artery Angiography and Embolization for the Treatment of Obesity: Technical Considerations.经桡动脉途径行胃左动脉血管造影及栓塞治疗肥胖症:技术要点
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Transradial interventions in contemporary vascular surgery practice.当代血管外科实践中的经桡动脉介入治疗。
Vascular. 2019 Feb;27(1):110-116. doi: 10.1177/1708538118797556. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach.经桡动脉或股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗时术者辐射暴露的随机对照研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jan;67(1):12-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20451.
6
Fewer Complications in the Obese Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Interventions.肥胖患者下肢血管腔内介入治疗后并发症较少。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 May;49:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.10.030. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
7
Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention.使用止血装置进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉、肱动脉和股动脉入路的比较。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 Jan;33(1):62-69. doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0439-4. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Retrograde embolization of anterior tibial artery for an iatrogenic arterio-venous fistula causing left lower extremity claudication.经皮胫前动脉逆行栓塞治疗医源性动静脉瘘致左下肢间歇性跛行
J Surg Case Rep. 2018 Aug 27;2018(8):rjy219. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjy219. eCollection 2018 Aug.
9
Comparison Between Radial Approach and Femoral Approach With Vascular Closure Devices on the Occurrence of Access-Site Complications and Periprocedural Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入术后使用血管闭合装置时桡动脉入路与股动脉入路在穿刺部位并发症及围手术期出血发生情况的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):473-479. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access.经桡动脉入路行心导管术时使用盆腔铅挡降低术者辐射剂量:与股动脉入路比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(4):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.013.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrograde Tibio-Pedal Access for Revascularization of Lower-Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease Using a 6 Fr Slender Sheath: The "Pedal-First" Pilot Project.使用6F细鞘经逆行胫-足入路行下肢外周动脉疾病血运重建:“足先入路”试点项目
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Sep;30(9):334-340.
2
Comparison of Frequency of Silent Cerebral Infarction After Coronary Angiography and Stenting With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approaches.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径冠状动脉造影及支架置入术后无症状性脑梗死发生率的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;122(4):548-553. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.056. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.
经桡动脉入路的现实情况检查:经桡动脉与经股动脉入路用于腹部和外周介入的单中心比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5580-2. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Arterial Access in Liver Cancer Embolization: Randomized Trial to Assess Patient Satisfaction.肝癌栓塞中经桡动脉与经股动脉入路:评估患者满意度的随机试验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jan;29(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
5
Incident of Stroke after Transradial Arterial Access for Subdiaphragmatic Intervention.经桡动脉入路行膈下介入治疗后发生卒中的情况。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Sep;28(9):1287-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.05.012.
6
Tibiopedal Access for Crossing of Infrainguinal Artery Occlusions: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.经胫足部入路治疗股腘动脉闭塞:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Dec;23(6):839-846. doi: 10.1177/1526602816664768. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Transradial Approach for Noncoronary Interventions: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility in the First 1,500 Cases.非冠状动脉介入的桡动脉途径:单中心对前1500例病例安全性和可行性的回顾
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
8
Feasibility and Safety of Routine Transpedal Arterial Access for Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease.经足背动脉入路常规治疗外周动脉疾病的可行性与安全性
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jul;27(7):327-30.
9
Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在极度肥胖患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug;5(8):819-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.009.
10
Retrograde approach for complex popliteal and tibioperoneal occlusions.复杂腘动脉和胫腓动脉闭塞的逆行入路
J Endovasc Ther. 2008 Oct;15(5):594-604. doi: 10.1583/08-2440.1.