Institute of Biomedicine, Research Centre for Integrative Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Drugs Aging. 2020 May;37(5):373-382. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00755-0.
Warfarin is underutilised in frail older people because of the fear of bleeding complications. Drug interactions are an independent bleeding risk factor. However, the extent to which potential drug interactions are taken into account at warfarin therapy initiation in frail patients is not known.
The objective of this study was to investigate the use of potentially interacting drugs increasing the bleeding risk before and after warfarin initiation in frail and non-frail patients.
We conducted an observational study including inpatients aged ≥ 60 years initiated on warfarin in a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, South Australia. Frailty status was assessed with the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. Medication charts were reviewed before and after warfarin initiation.
In total, 151 patients (102 non-frail and 49 frail) were included. Before warfarin initiation, the use of clopidogrel and acetaminophen was more common in frail patients compared with non-frail patients (25.5% vs 10.2%, p = 0.0135, 63.8% vs 35.7% p = 0.0014, respectively). The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 9.2% in non-frail patients and 6.4% in frail patients before warfarin initiation, was completely stopped after warfarin initiation in both groups. The use of antiplatelet drugs decreased from 56.1% in non-frail patients and 66.0 % in frail patients to 12.2% and 14.9%, respectively. Instead, the use of drugs affecting the metabolism of warfarin or vitamin K increased in both groups. No statistically significant difference was seen in the exposure to interacting drugs between study groups after warfarin initiation. Acetaminophen, senna glycosides and cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibiting drugs were the most common interacting drugs at discharge used in 49.0%, 18.4% and 20.4% of non-frail patients and 53.2%, 29.8% and 19.1% of frail patients, respectively.
The overall frequency of potential drug interactions was moderate and frail patients were not exposed to warfarin drug interactions more often than non-frail patients. Further studies in larger study populations are required to verify these results.
由于担心出血并发症,华法林在体弱的老年人中使用不足。药物相互作用是出血的独立危险因素。然而,在开始华法林治疗时,虚弱患者的潜在药物相互作用被考虑到何种程度尚不清楚。
本研究旨在调查在虚弱和非虚弱患者中,在开始使用华法林之前和之后,使用增加出血风险的潜在相互作用药物的情况。
我们进行了一项观察性研究,纳入了在南澳大利亚阿德莱德的一家三级医院接受华法林治疗的年龄≥60 岁的住院患者。使用报告的埃德蒙顿衰弱量表评估衰弱状态。在开始华法林治疗之前和之后,审查了药物图表。
共纳入 151 名患者(102 名非虚弱患者和 49 名虚弱患者)。在开始华法林治疗之前,与非虚弱患者相比,虚弱患者使用氯吡格雷和对乙酰氨基酚更为常见(25.5%比 10.2%,p=0.0135;63.8%比 35.7%,p=0.0014)。在开始华法林治疗之前,非甾体抗炎药在非虚弱患者中的使用率为 9.2%,在虚弱患者中的使用率为 6.4%,但两组患者在开始华法林治疗后均完全停用。抗血小板药物的使用率从非虚弱患者的 56.1%和虚弱患者的 66.0%降至 12.2%和 14.9%。相反,两组患者华法林或维生素 K 代谢药物的使用率增加。两组患者在开始华法林治疗后,相互作用药物的暴露情况无统计学差异。在非虚弱患者中,最常见的相互作用药物为对乙酰氨基酚(49.0%)、番泻苷类(18.4%)和细胞色素 P450 2C9 抑制剂(20.4%);在虚弱患者中,最常见的相互作用药物为对乙酰氨基酚(53.2%)、番泻苷类(29.8%)和细胞色素 P450 2C9 抑制剂(19.1%)。
总的来说,潜在药物相互作用的频率是中度的,虚弱患者接触华法林药物相互作用的频率并不高于非虚弱患者。需要在更大的研究人群中进行进一步的研究来验证这些结果。