Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jan;41(1):106-111. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1718626. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
The aim of this study was to compare the spillage rate and surgical outcomes between the leak-proof technique and the conventional technique in laparoscopy for large ovarian cysts (more than 15 cm in diameter) presumed to be benign tumours and free from adhesion. Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy with the leak-proof technique between 2017 and 2019 (the practice change cohort) were compared retrospectively with 35 case-matched consecutive patients who underwent the conventional purse-string method between 2014 and 2016 (the historical cohort). In the practice change cohort, through the wound retractor in the umbilicus, large ovarian cysts were first covered with a sterilised vinyl membrane applied with a skin adhesive, then punctured, and the contents directly aspirated. The primary outcome was tumour spillage. The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. The spillage rate in the practice change cohort was significantly lower than in the historical cohort (0% vs 28.6%; = .001). Other surgical outcomes, including operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, and operative complications were similar between the cohorts. In conclusion, laparoscopy with the leak-proof technique is reliable, safe, and easily implemented in the management of selected patients with large ovarian tumours and low probability of malignancy.IMPACT STATEMENT Large ovarian cysts preclude the laparoscopic surgery because the size of the cyst interferes with adequate visualisation of the pelvic anatomy and confines the mobilisation of laparoscopic devices. Laparoscopy with the leak-proof technique is reliable, safe, and easily implemented in the management of selected patients with large ovarian tumours and low probability of malignancy. This technique is easily implemented and useful for most gynaecologic surgeons in treating extremely large ovarian cysts.
本研究旨在比较防漏技术和传统技术在腹腔镜下治疗直径大于 15cm、被认为是良性肿瘤且无粘连的大型卵巢囊肿(大于 15cm)的溢出率和手术结果。将 2017 年至 2019 年期间采用防漏技术行腹腔镜手术的 35 例连续患者(实践改变队列)与 2014 年至 2016 年期间采用传统荷包缝合法的 35 例连续病例匹配患者(历史队列)进行回顾性比较。在实践改变队列中,通过脐部的切口扩张器,首先将大型卵巢囊肿用贴有皮肤粘合剂的消毒乙烯基膜覆盖,然后穿刺,直接抽吸内容物。主要结局是肿瘤溢出。两个队列的基线特征相似。实践改变队列的溢出率明显低于历史队列(0%比 28.6%; = .001)。两组的其他手术结果,包括手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间和手术并发症均相似。总之,对于选择的大型卵巢肿瘤且恶性可能性低的患者,采用防漏技术的腹腔镜手术是可靠、安全且易于实施的。
大型卵巢囊肿会妨碍腹腔镜手术,因为囊肿的大小会干扰盆腔解剖结构的充分可视化,并限制腹腔镜器械的移动。采用防漏技术的腹腔镜手术是可靠、安全且易于实施的,适用于选择的大型卵巢肿瘤且恶性可能性低的患者。该技术易于实施,对大多数妇科医生治疗特大卵巢囊肿非常有用。