State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110247. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110247. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Terracing and vegetation restoration are the basic measures to protect soil from water erosion and to combat land degradation. However, long-term quantitative evaluation on the erosion control benefits of different terracing techniques and vegetation types are still insufficient, particularly under variable rainfall. The aim of this article, therefore, is to evaluate the coupling effects of different terracing-vegetation combinations and rainfall types (RTs) on runoff retention and erosion reduction in a loess hilly catchment of China. Six types of terracing-vegetation combinations, including leveled benches-C. microphylla (LM), fish-scale pits-P. orientalis (FO), leveled ditches-P. armeniaca (LA), zig terraces-P. orientalis (ZO), fish-scale pits-P. tabulaeformis (FT), zig terraces-P. tabulaeformis (ZT) and the corresponding plots with same vegetation cover and non-terracing measures were designed and monitored. Based on five consecutive years of monitoring data, 69 rainfall events causing runoff and erosion were observed. Rainfall eigenvalues, including rainfall amount (RA), maximum 10-min intensity (I), maximum 30-min intensity (I) and rainfall duration (RD) dominated water erosion processes. Surface runoff and sediment reduction benefits differed with different terracing techniques. Mean runoff coefficients (R) among all kinds of terracing-vegetation combinations were FT > LM > FO > LA > ZO > ZT, while mean soil loss rates (E) among all kinds of combinations were FT > FO > LM > LA > ZT > ZO. ZT showed the highest mean runoff reduction (44.03%), while ZO generated the highest sediment reduction (39.08%). The worst performance was observed in FT. With regards to the results, it is necessary to select the optimal terracing-vegetation measures for erosion control based on the dominant rainfall eigenvalues in different areas. Overall, ZT, ZO and LA combinations are recommended, while uncertainty was detected in combinations with fish-scale pits. Suitable terracing-vegetation measures should be selected after considering the micro-relief construction, the optimization of plant disposition and the efficiency of water erosion reduction. Management should focus on the construction standards, the threshold of resisting erosion for each terracing measure, and timely maintenance of the terraces.
梯田和植被恢复是防止土壤遭受水蚀和防治土地退化的基本措施。然而,不同梯田技术和植被类型的侵蚀控制效益的长期定量评价仍然不足,特别是在降雨变化的情况下。因此,本文的目的是评估不同梯田-植被组合和降雨类型(RTs)对中国黄土丘陵流域径流量保留和侵蚀减少的耦合效应。设计并监测了六种梯田-植被组合,包括水平梯田-沙棘(LM)、鱼鳞坑-刺槐(FO)、水平沟-杏树(LA)、之字形梯田-刺槐(ZO)、鱼鳞坑-白皮松(FT)、之字形梯田-白皮松(ZT)和具有相同植被覆盖和非梯田措施的相应对照区。基于连续五年的监测数据,共观测到 69 场引起径流量和侵蚀的降雨事件。降雨特征值,包括降雨量(RA)、最大 10 分钟强度(I)、最大 30 分钟强度(I)和降雨持续时间(RD),主导着水蚀过程。地表径流量和泥沙减少效益因不同的梯田技术而异。各种梯田-植被组合的平均径流系数(R)分别为 FT>LM>FO>LA>ZO>ZT,而各种组合的平均土壤流失率(E)分别为 FT>FO>LM>LA>ZT>ZO。ZT 的平均径流量减少率最高(44.03%),而 ZO 的泥沙减少率最高(39.08%)。FT 的表现最差。从结果来看,有必要根据不同地区的主导降雨特征值,选择最优的梯田-植被措施来控制侵蚀。总体而言,推荐采用 ZT、ZO 和 LA 组合,而鱼鳞坑组合存在不确定性。在考虑微地形建设、植物配置优化和水蚀减少效率的基础上,应选择合适的梯田-植被措施。管理应侧重于建设标准、每种梯田措施的抗侵蚀阈值以及梯田的及时维护。