• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业人员气管内吸痰的知识与实践:一项系统综述

Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Pinto Halita J, D'silva Fatima, Sanil Thankappan S

机构信息

Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Nitte Usha Institute of Nursing Sciences, Nitte University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Biostatistics, KSHEMA, Nitte University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(1):23-32. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23326.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23326
PMID:32148345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7050166/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common cause of mortality and morbidity, is commonly seen among patients with endotracheal intubation due to unsafe suctioning practices by health professionals.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was conducted to explore the gaps in the existing practices of nurses and thus proposing comprehensive guidelines for safe practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A two-phase strategy was adopted to identify the studies through a comprehensive electronic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, ProQuest, Ovid, and Helinet Summon by using predefined keywords within a year limit of 2002-2016. The quality of studies was reviewed using tools endorsed by Joanna Briggs Institute. This review was conducted according to the guidelines described in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Qualitative data were described through the process of metasynthesis. Quantitative analysis was performed to combine the competent quantitative evidences to identify knowledge and practices of endotracheal suctioning (ETS).

RESULTS

Thirty studies had been subjected for metasynthesis, among which six provided relevant information for quantitative analysis. Quantitative analysis of the studies reported that only 36% of the nurses had assessed patients prior to suctioning and had knowledge about the size of the suction catheter while only 46% were aware of the appropriate suction pressure to be used for ETS. Handwashing compliance prior to suctioning was observed in only 62% of the nurses. It is reported that, despite the awareness on possible complications, nurses fail to adhere to the recommended practice guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The current review would explore the best evidence-based practices (EBPs) among nurses related to ETS, which would ensure quality care to critically ill patients.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Pinto HJ, D'silva F, Sanil TS. Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(1):23-32.

摘要

引言

呼吸机相关性肺炎是导致死亡和发病的常见原因,在因医护人员不安全的吸痰操作而进行气管插管的患者中很常见。

目的

进行系统综述,以探索护士现有操作中的差距,从而提出安全操作的综合指南。

材料与方法

采用两阶段策略,通过在PubMed、谷歌学术、ProQuest、Ovid和Helinet Summon中使用预定义关键词进行全面的电子搜索,在2002年至2016年的一年时间限制内识别研究。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所认可的工具对研究质量进行评估。本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)中所述的指南进行。通过元综合过程描述定性数据。进行定量分析以合并有效的定量证据,以确定气管内吸痰(ETS)的知识和操作。

结果

30项研究进行了元综合,其中6项提供了定量分析的相关信息。对这些研究的定量分析报告称,只有36%的护士在吸痰前对患者进行了评估并了解吸痰导管的尺寸,而只有46%的护士知道用于ETS的适当吸痰压力。只有62%的护士在吸痰前遵守了洗手规定。据报道,尽管护士们意识到了可能的并发症,但他们并未遵守推荐的操作指南。

结论

本综述将探索护士中与ETS相关的最佳循证实践(EBP),这将确保为重症患者提供优质护理。

如何引用本文

平托HJ、达席尔瓦F、萨尼尔TS。护理专业人员气管内吸痰的知识与实践:一项系统综述。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2020年;24(1):23 - 32。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b39/7050166/e75662614f6f/ijccm-24-23-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b39/7050166/e75662614f6f/ijccm-24-23-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b39/7050166/e75662614f6f/ijccm-24-23-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review.护理专业人员气管内吸痰的知识与实践:一项系统综述
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(1):23-32. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23326.
2
An observational study on the open-system endotracheal suctioning practices of critical care nurses.一项关于重症护理护士开放式气管内吸痰操作的观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):360-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01990.x.
3
Is paediatric endotracheal suctioning by nurses evidence based? An International Survey.护士进行儿科经气管吸引是否有循证依据?一项国际调查。
Nurs Crit Care. 2021 Sep;26(5):372-379. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12644. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
Benefits and harms of normal saline instillation before endotracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated adult patients in intensive care units: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.生理盐水灌洗在 ICU 机械通气成人患者气管内吸引前的利弊:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023 Oct;78:103477. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103477. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
5
Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs).针对医护人员对重症监护病房患者进行气管内吸痰操作的审计。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan;28(1):58-65. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24615.
6
Intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of evidence-based recommendations for endotracheal suctioning: a multisite cross-sectional study in Changsha, China.重症监护护士对气管内吸痰循证推荐的知识与实践:中国长沙的一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Oct 4;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00715-y.
7
Survey of Italian intensive care unit nurses' knowledge about endotracheal suctioning guidelines.意大利重症监护病房护士关于气管内吸痰指南的知识调查。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Dec;30(6):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
The practice of intensive care nurses using the closed suctioning system: An observational study.重症监护护士使用封闭式吸痰系统的实践:一项观察性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015 Sep-Oct;20(5):619-25. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.164509.
9
The Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning in the Pediatric Population: An Integrative Review.气管内吸引对儿科人群的影响:一项综合综述。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;37(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000275.
10
A scoping review to map the implications of reusing single-use endotracheal suctioning catheter practices in mechanically ventilated patients.一项范围综述,旨在梳理在机械通气患者中重复使用一次性气管内吸痰导管做法的影响。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr;87:103848. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103848. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A multimedia tool for infection prevention and control practices in the intensive care unit: a participatory interventional before-after study.一种用于重症监护病房感染预防与控制实践的多媒体工具:一项前后对照的参与性干预研究。
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Dec 5;7(1):100423. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100423. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Intensive Care Nurses' Performance of Open versus Closed Endotracheal Suction on Critically Ill Patients in Ismailia City.伊斯梅利亚市重症监护护士对危重症患者进行开放式与封闭式气管内吸痰的操作情况
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024 Sep 4;29(5):590-595. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_351_22. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Endotracheal suctioning practices of nurses and respiratory therapists: How well do they align with clinical practice guidelines?护士和呼吸治疗师的气管内吸痰操作:他们与临床实践指南的契合程度如何?
Can J Respir Ther. 2015 Summer;51(3):60-4.
2
Comparison the effects of shallow and deep endotracheal tube suctioning on respiratory rate, arterial blood oxygen saturation and number of suctioning in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial.比较浅部和深部气管内吸痰对重症监护病房住院患者呼吸频率、动脉血氧饱和度及吸痰次数的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Caring Sci. 2014 Sep 1;3(3):157-64. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.017. eCollection 2014 Sep.
3
Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs).
针对医护人员对重症监护病房患者进行气管内吸痰操作的审计。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan;28(1):58-65. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24615.
4
My hands are running away - learning a complex nursing skill via virtual reality simulation: a randomised mixed methods study.我的双手不受控制了——通过虚拟现实模拟学习复杂的护理技能:一项随机混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jun 27;22(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01384-9.
5
Insights on Competency and Knowledge Related to the Tracheostomy Care of Nurses at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Oman.阿曼一家三级转诊医院护士气管造口护理相关能力与知识洞察
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03433-2. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
6
Adherence of critical care nurses to endotracheal suctioning guidelines: a cross-sectional study.重症监护护士对气管内吸痰指南的依从性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 14;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01092-w.
7
A Study to Assess the Compliance on Hand Hygiene during Bundle of Care Interventions among Healthcare Professionals Working in ICU of a Tertiary Care Hospital.一项评估三级护理医院重症监护病房医护人员在综合护理干预期间手部卫生依从性的研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep;26(9):1006-1010. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24293.
8
Investigation of the airway management practice of emergency department ward nurses: a nationwide survey in China.调查中国急诊科病房护士的气道管理实践:全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e049869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049869.
Survey of Italian intensive care unit nurses' knowledge about endotracheal suctioning guidelines.
意大利重症监护病房护士关于气管内吸痰指南的知识调查。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Dec;30(6):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
4
Effects of open and closed suction systems on the haemodynamic parameters in cardiac surgery patients.开放式和封闭式吸引系统对心脏手术患者血流动力学参数的影响。
Nurs Crit Care. 2015 May;20(3):118-25. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12094. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
5
Comparison of airway management practices between registered nurses and respiratory care practitioners.注册护士与呼吸治疗师气道管理实践的比较。
Am J Crit Care. 2014 May;23(3):191-9; quiz 200. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014424.
6
Essential principles: tracheostomy care in the adult patient.基本原则:成年患者的气管造口护理
Nurs Crit Care. 2014 Mar;19(2):63-72. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12076.
7
Discrepancy between guidelines and practice of tracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients: a French multicenter observational study.机械通气患者气管吸痰指南与实践的差异:一项法国多中心观察性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jul;39(7):1335-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2936-6. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
Decreasing the adverse effects of endotracheal suctioning during mechanical ventilation by changing practice.通过改变操作方式来减少机械通气时经气管吸引的不良影响。
Respir Care. 2013 Oct;58(10):1588-97. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02265. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Development of standard practice guidelines for open and closed system suctioning.开放式和封闭式吸引标准操作规范的制定。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 May;21(9-10):1327-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
10
Care of adult patients with a temporary tracheostomy.
Nurs Stand. 2011;26(2):49-56; quiz 58. doi: 10.7748/ns2011.09.26.2.49.c8706.