Suppr超能文献

心脏内器械导线上的移动回声密度:是否总是令人担忧?

Mobile echodensities on intracardiac device leads: Is it always a cause for concern?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;43(4):388-393. doi: 10.1111/pace.13899. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) frequently undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). As a result, incidental mobile echodensities (MEDs) attached to device leads are commonly detected. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and clinical outcomes of incidental MEDs on CIED leads.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis performed between 2011 and 2018 identified 3548 TTE studies performed on 1849 patients with CIEDs.

RESULTS

MEDs were identified in 30 patients (1.6%) without clinical suspicion of infective endocarditis (IE). Patients with incidental MEDs were apyrexial, and those tested demonstrated low inflammatory markers and negative blood cultures (BC). In this group, the majority (83%) of MEDs were in the right atrium and no MEDs were detected near the tricuspid valve. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) did not influence clinical outcomes. No patient required long-term antibiotics or lead extraction and no IE-related deaths were identified from electronic health records during a mean follow-up period of 43 months (1-89). In contrast, nine patients with suspected IE were all pyrexial with elevated inflammatory markers, had positive BC, and had proven IE. In these cases, the majority of MEDs were at the device lead/tricuspid valve interface. MEDs close to the tricuspid valve were strongly associated with IE (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of MEDs on CIED leads detected on routine TTE was 1.6%. Conservative management of asymptomatic patients with normal inflammatory markers and BC without TEE, antibiotics, or lead extraction did not reveal any signal for long-term adverse events within the limitations of the study.

摘要

背景

患有心脏植入式电子设备 (CIED) 的患者经常接受经胸超声心动图 (TTE) 检查。因此,通常会发现附着在设备导线上的偶然移动的超声散射体 (MED)。本研究旨在评估 CIED 导线上偶然 MED 的发生率和临床结局。

方法

回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2018 年间对 1849 例 CIED 患者进行的 3548 次 TTE 研究。

结果

在没有感染性心内膜炎 (IE) 临床怀疑的 30 例患者中发现了 MED。偶然 MED 的患者无发热,且经检测炎症标志物水平较低,血培养 (BC) 阴性。在这组患者中,大多数 (83%) MED 位于右心房,且在三尖瓣附近未发现 MED。经食管超声心动图 (TEE) 并未影响临床结局。没有患者需要长期使用抗生素或进行导线拔除,且在平均 43 个月 (1-89 个月) 的电子健康记录随访期间未发现与 IE 相关的死亡。相比之下,9 例疑似 IE 的患者均发热,炎症标志物升高,BC 阳性,且 IE 得到证实。在这些病例中,大多数 MED 位于设备导线/三尖瓣交界处。靠近三尖瓣的 MED 与 IE 密切相关 (P<.0001)。

结论

在常规 TTE 上检测到 CIED 导线上 MED 的发生率为 1.6%。对无发热、炎症标志物和 BC 正常且无 TEE、抗生素或导线拔除的无症状患者进行保守管理,且在研究的局限性范围内,未发现任何与长期不良事件相关的信号。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验