Suppr超能文献

保留Scarpa筋膜的腹壁成形术:引流管数量的前瞻性对比研究

Abdominoplasty With Scarpa Fascia Preservation: Prospective Comparative Study of Suction Drain Number.

作者信息

Pisco Andreia, Rebelo Marco, Peres Helena, Costa-Ferreira António

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery and Physiology, Porto University Medical School.

Plastic Surgery Department, IPO Porto.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;84(4):356-360. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002349.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominoplasty is becoming increasingly more common, with seroma being the most frequent complication. Suction drains are used very often as a method to prevent seroma formation, and it has been suggested that techniques using Scarpa fascia preservation and closed-suction drains have lower seroma rates than other approaches. However few studies have addressed parameters that may affect drain efficiency. A prospective comparative study was conducted to determine if applying 2 or 3 closed-suction drains, after an abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation, has any effect on several outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center study conducted from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were allocated according to choice to 1 of the 2 surgeons involved in the study, each responsible for 1 group: abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation with 2 closed-suction drains placed postoperatively (group A) or with 3 closed-suction drains (group B). A comparative analysis of selected variables was done between both groups, including time to drain removal, total and daily drain output, duration of hospital stay, emergency department visit, readmission to the hospital, secondary surgical procedure, and incidence of postoperative local and systemic complications.

RESULTS

A total of 73 abdominoplasties with Scarpa fascia preservation were performed in women (group A, 33 patients; group B, 40 patients). General characteristics of group A and B were similar. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any of the determined variables, namely, main outcomes (total and daily drain output, time to drain removal) or complications (local or systemic).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that using 3 closed-suction drains postabdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation has no advantages in total and daily drain output, time to drain removal, or complications when compared with the usual 2 drains approach.

摘要

背景

腹壁成形术越来越常见,血清肿是最常见的并发症。负压引流管常被用作预防血清肿形成的方法,有人认为采用保留斯卡帕筋膜和密闭负压引流管的技术血清肿发生率低于其他方法。然而,很少有研究探讨可能影响引流效率的参数。进行了一项前瞻性对照研究,以确定在保留斯卡帕筋膜的腹壁成形术后放置2根或3根密闭负压引流管是否会对多个结果产生影响。

方法

这是一项于2016年9月至2019年3月进行的单中心研究。患者根据选择被分配到参与研究的2位外科医生中的1位,每位医生负责1组:保留斯卡帕筋膜的腹壁成形术,术后放置2根密闭负压引流管(A组)或3根密闭负压引流管(B组)。对两组间选定变量进行比较分析,包括引流管拔除时间、引流总量和每日引流量、住院时间、急诊就诊、再次入院、二次手术以及术后局部和全身并发症的发生率。

结果

共对女性患者进行了73例保留斯卡帕筋膜的腹壁成形术(A组33例患者;B组40例患者)。A组和B组的一般特征相似。在任何已确定的变量中,即主要结果(引流总量和每日引流量、引流管拔除时间)或并发症(局部或全身)方面,两组之间均无统计学显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,与通常的2根引流管方法相比,在保留斯卡帕筋膜的腹壁成形术后使用3根密闭负压引流管在引流总量和每日引流量、引流管拔除时间或并发症方面并无优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验