Rao Gautham, Daneshi Kian, Ceccaroni Alessandra, Gentile Antonioenrico, El-Shazali Hafiz, Owens Niamh, Vyas Krishna, Khajuria Ankur
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Dec 12;45(1):71-83. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae171.
Closed suction drains are placed to prevent seroma formation after abdominoplasty, but evidence of their effectiveness is limited, and they may increase infection risk and patient discomfort. Previous meta-analyses comparing progressive tension suturing (PTS) to drainage (D) in abdominoplasty have been methodologically weak and small in sample size. In this study we aimed to conduct the first robust systematic review comparing PTS and D outcomes in abdominoplasty. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022346106). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from September 19, 2022, to February 19, 2024. Data were pooled with a random effects Mantel-Haenszel model. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool and the ROBINS-I tool for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system evaluated methodological quality. PTS significantly reduced postoperative seroma rates (relative risk [RR] 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.76; P = .001) and reoperation rates (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.03-9.77; P = .05) compared to drains, with no significant differences in hematomas, infections, or dehiscence. The review included 24 studies with 750 patients, including 2 randomized controlled trials, and was found to be methodologically superior by AMSTAR 2 criteria. Subgroup analysis indicated that combining liposuction with PTS significantly reduced seromas (RR 0.18; 95%CI 0.00-7.39; P < .00001), infections (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.86; P = .03), and dehiscence (RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01-1.01; P = .05). This robust meta-analysis showed that PTS was more effective than drains in reducing seroma and reoperation rates, with no difference for hematomas or infections. Combining liposuction with PTS may be superior to placing drains. Larger, high-quality studies are needed to further assess the safety and efficacy of drainless abdominoplasty.
放置闭式引流管是为了预防腹部整形术后血清肿形成,但关于其有效性的证据有限,而且它们可能会增加感染风险和患者不适。以往比较腹部整形术中渐进性张力缝合(PTS)与引流(D)的荟萃分析在方法学上存在缺陷且样本量较小。在本研究中,我们旨在进行首次严谨的系统评价,比较腹部整形术中PTS和D的效果。该研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42022346106)登记。我们检索了2022年9月19日至2024年2月19日期间的MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、谷歌学术和科学网。数据采用随机效应Mantel-Haenszel模型进行汇总。分别使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和ROBINS-I工具对随机对照试验和观察性研究的偏倚风险进行评估。使用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定与评价)系统评估方法学质量。与引流相比,PTS显著降低了术后血清肿发生率(相对风险[RR] 0.34;95%置信区间[CI] 0.15 - 0.76;P = 0.001)和再次手术率(RR = 0.56;95% CI 0.03 - 9.77;P = 0.05),在血肿、感染或伤口裂开方面无显著差异。该综述纳入了24项研究共750例患者,包括2项随机对照试验,根据AMSTAR 2标准发现其在方法学上更优。亚组分析表明,抽脂联合PTS可显著降低血清肿(RR 0.18;95% CI 0.00 - 7.39;P < 0.00001)、感染(RR 0.16;95% CI 0.03 - 0.86;P = 0.03)和伤口裂开(RR 0.11;95% CI 0.01 - 1.01;P = 0.05)。这项严谨的荟萃分析表明,在降低血清肿和再次手术率方面,PTS比引流更有效,在血肿或感染方面无差异。抽脂联合PTS可能优于放置引流管。需要更大规模、高质量的研究来进一步评估无引流腹部整形术的安全性和有效性。