• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与急诊科潜在阑尾炎漏诊相关的因素。

Factors Associated With Potentially Missed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in the Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200612. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0612.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0612
PMID:32150270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063499/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Appendicitis may be missed during initial emergency department (ED) presentation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patients with a potentially missed diagnosis of appendicitis (ie, patients with symptoms associated with appendicitis, including abdominal pain, constipation, nausea and/or vomiting, fever, and diarrhea diagnosed within 1-30 days after initial ED presentation) with patients diagnosed with appendicitis on the same day of ED presentation to identify factors associated with potentially missed appendicitis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, a retrospective analysis of commercially insured claims data was conducted from January 1 to December 15, 2019. Patients who presented to the ED with undifferentiated symptoms associated with appendicitis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, were identified using the Clinformatics Data Mart administrative database (Optum Insights). The study sample comprised eligible adults (aged ≥18 years) and children (aged <18 years) who had previous ED visits within 30 days of an appendicitis diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Potentially missed diagnosis of appendicitis. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for abdominal pain and its combinations with other symptoms associated with appendicitis were compared between patients with a same-day diagnosis of appendicitis and patients with a potentially missed diagnosis of appendicitis.

RESULTS

Of 187 461 patients with a diagnosis of appendicitis, a total of 123 711 (66%; 101 375 adults [81.9%] and 22 336 children [18.1%]) were eligible for analysis. Among adults, 51 923 (51.2%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 44.3 (18.2) years; among children, 9631 (43.1%) were girls, with a mean (SD) age of 12.2 (18.2) years. The frequency of potentially missed appendicitis was 6060 of 101 375 adults (6.0%) and 973 of 22 336 children (4.4%). Patients with isolated abdominal pain (adults, AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62-0.69; P < .001; children, AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90; P < .001) or with abdominal pain and nausea and/or vomiting (adults, AOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97; P = .003; children, AOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .03) were less likely to have missed appendicitis. Patients with abdominal pain and constipation (adults, AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.31-1.75; P < .001; children, AOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.86-3.17; P < .001) were more likely to have missed appendicitis. Stratified by the presence of undifferentiated symptoms, women (abdominal pain, AOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.58-1.78; nausea and/or vomiting, AOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.85; fever, AOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; diarrhea, AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01-1.40; and constipation, AOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.24-1.82) and girls (abdominal pain, AOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.43-1.88; nausea and/or vomiting, AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42-2.13; fever, AOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.14-2.11; diarrhea, AOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.19-2.74; and constipation, AOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.88-1.78) as well as patients with a comorbidity index of 2 or greater (adults, abdominal pain, AOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 3.09-3.60; nausea and/or vomiting, AOR, 3.66; 95% CI, 3.23-4.14; fever, AOR, 5.00; 95% CI, 3.79-6.60; diarrhea, AOR, 4.27; 95% CI, 3.39-5.38; and constipation, AOR, 4.17; 95% CI, 3.08-5.65; children, abdominal pain, AOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.93-3.05; nausea and/or vomiting, AOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.89-3.45; fever, AOR, 4.12; 95% CI, 2.71-6.25; diarrhea, AOR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.18-3.97; and constipation, AOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.30-3.70) were more likely to have missed appendicitis. Adult patients who received computed tomographic scans at the initial ED visit (abdominal pain, AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.52-0.65; nausea and/or vomiting, AOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.75; fever, AOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.58; diarrhea, AOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.58-1.20; and constipation, AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.94) were less likely to have missed appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Regardless of age, a missed diagnosis of appendicitis was more likely to occur in women, patients with comorbidities, and patients who experienced abdominal pain accompanied by constipation. Population-based estimates of the rates of potentially missed appendicitis reveal opportunities for improvement and identify factors that may mitigate the risk of a missed diagnosis.

摘要

重要性:在初始急诊就诊时,阑尾炎可能会被漏诊。

目的:比较潜在漏诊阑尾炎(即有阑尾炎相关症状的患者,包括腹痛、便秘、恶心和/或呕吐、发热和腹泻,这些症状在急诊就诊后 1-30 天内被诊断)与在同一天因腹痛就诊的阑尾炎患者,以确定潜在漏诊阑尾炎相关的因素。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项基于队列的研究中,回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 15 日期间商业保险索赔数据的临床信息数据集市。使用 Optum Insights 中的 Clinformatics Data Mart 行政数据库,从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,确定了有未分化症状与阑尾炎相关且在阑尾诊断前 30 天内有先前急诊就诊的符合条件的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)和儿童(年龄<18 岁)。

主要结果和措施:潜在的阑尾炎漏诊。对同一天诊断为阑尾炎和潜在漏诊阑尾炎的患者的腹痛及其与阑尾炎相关的其他症状的组合进行调整后的优势比(AOR)比较。

结果:在 187461 例阑尾炎诊断患者中,共有 123711 例(66%;101375 例成年人[81.9%]和 22336 例儿童[18.1%])符合分析条件。在成年人中,51923 例(51.2%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为 44.3(18.2)岁;在儿童中,9631 例(43.1%)为女孩,平均(SD)年龄为 12.2(18.2)岁。潜在漏诊阑尾炎的频率为 101375 例成年人中的 6060 例(6.0%)和 22336 例儿童中的 973 例(4.4%)。仅腹痛(成年人,AOR,0.65;95%置信区间,0.62-0.69;P<0.001;儿童,AOR,0.79;95%置信区间,0.69-0.90;P<0.001)或腹痛伴恶心和/或呕吐(成年人,AOR,0.90;95%置信区间,0.84-0.97;P=0.003;儿童,AOR,0.84;95%置信区间,0.71-0.98;P=0.03)的患者不太可能漏诊阑尾炎。腹痛伴便秘(成年人,AOR,1.51;95%置信区间,1.31-1.75;P<0.001;儿童,AOR,2.43;95%置信区间,1.86-3.17;P<0.001)的患者更有可能漏诊阑尾炎。按未分化症状分层,女性(腹痛,AOR,1.68;95%置信区间,1.58-1.78;恶心和/或呕吐,AOR,1.68;95%置信区间,1.52-1.85;发热,AOR,1.32;95%置信区间,1.10-1.59;腹泻,AOR,1.19;95%置信区间,1.01-1.40;便秘,AOR,1.50;95%置信区间,1.24-1.82)和女孩(腹痛,AOR,1.64;95%置信区间,1.43-1.88;恶心和/或呕吐,AOR,1.74;95%置信区间,1.42-2.13;发热,AOR,1.55;95%置信区间,1.14-2.11;腹泻,AOR,1.80;95%置信区间,1.19-2.74;便秘,AOR,1.25;95%置信区间,0.88-1.78)以及合并症指数为 2 或更高的患者(成年人,腹痛,AOR,3.33;95%置信区间,3.09-3.60;恶心和/或呕吐,AOR,3.66;95%置信区间,3.23-4.14;发热,AOR,5.00;95%置信区间,3.79-6.60;腹泻,AOR,4.27;95%置信区间,3.39-5.38;便秘,AOR,4.17;95%置信区间,3.08-5.65;儿童,腹痛,AOR,2.42;95%置信区间,1.93-3.05;恶心和/或呕吐,AOR,2.55;95%置信区间,1.89-3.45;发热,AOR,4.12;95%置信区间,2.71-6.25;腹泻,AOR,2.17;95%置信区间,1.18-3.97;便秘,AOR,2.19;95%置信区间,1.30-3.70)更有可能漏诊阑尾炎。在初始急诊就诊时接受计算机断层扫描的成年患者(腹痛,AOR,0.58;95%置信区间,0.52-0.65;恶心和/或呕吐,AOR,0.63;95%置信区间,0.52-0.75;发热,AOR,0.41;95%置信区间,0.29-0.58;腹泻,AOR,0.83;95%置信区间,0.58-1.20;便秘,AOR,0.60;95%置信区间,0.39-0.94)不太可能漏诊阑尾炎。

结论和相关性:无论年龄大小,女性、合并症患者和出现腹痛伴便秘的患者更有可能出现阑尾炎漏诊。基于人群的潜在漏诊阑尾炎发生率的估计表明,存在改进的机会,并确定了可能降低漏诊风险的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a1/7063499/fe0d5f758514/jamanetwopen-3-e200612-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a1/7063499/fe0d5f758514/jamanetwopen-3-e200612-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a1/7063499/fe0d5f758514/jamanetwopen-3-e200612-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Associated With Potentially Missed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in the Emergency Department.与急诊科潜在阑尾炎漏诊相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200612. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0612.
2
Pediatric Appendicitis: Association of Chief Complaint With Missed Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎:主要症状与漏诊阑尾炎的关联
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Apr;36(4):e204-e207. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001390.
3
Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Diagnostic Imaging for Pediatric Appendicitis: A Cluster Randomized Trial.临床决策支持对小儿阑尾炎诊断性影像学检查的影响:一项整群随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036344. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36344.
4
Clinical Features and Preventability of Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎延迟诊断的临床特征和可预防因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22248.
5
The utility of the emergency department observation unit for children with abdominal pain.急诊科观察单元对腹痛儿童的效用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):574-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e572d.
6
Missed appendicitis in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科的阑尾炎漏诊
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993 Feb;9(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199302000-00002.
7
Race and acute abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊中的种族与急性腹痛。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):1098-106. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3672. Epub 2013 May 20.
8
False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery.腹痛评估中的假阴性和假阳性错误:急性阑尾炎漏诊与不必要的手术。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;7(11):1244-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00470.x.
9
Misdiagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children Attending the Emergency Department: The Experience of a Large, Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital.急诊科儿童急性阑尾炎的误诊:一家大型三级护理儿童医院的经验。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Apr;27(2):138-141. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570757. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Delayed Diagnoses in Children with Constipation: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.儿童便秘延迟诊断:多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;186:87-94.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.061. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Pediatric Diagnostic Quality Measurement in All United States Hospitals.美国所有医院开展儿科诊断质量测量的可行性
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.07.035.
2
Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis-Related Mortality Across U.S. Demographics and Regions: A 22-Year CDC WONDER Database Study.美国不同人口统计学特征和地区阑尾炎相关死亡率的趋势与差异:一项为期22年的疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)WONDER数据库研究
World J Surg. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70023.
3
Assessing the Efficacy of Ultrasound Imaging for Diagnosing Appendicitis in Male Patients: A Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
An Operational Framework to Study Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments: Findings From A Consensus Panel.一个研究急诊科诊断错误的操作框架:共识小组的发现。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):570-575. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000624.
2
Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.成人急性阑尾炎诊断的计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.
3
Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety.
评估超声成像对男性患者阑尾炎的诊断效能:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 25;17(6):e86749. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86749. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
The Misdiagnosis Tracker: Enhancing Diagnostic Reasoning Through Cognitive Bias Awareness and Error Analysis.误诊追踪器:通过认知偏差意识和错误分析提高诊断推理能力
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 11;14(12):4139. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124139.
5
Acute appendicitis masquerading as food poisoning.伪装成食物中毒的急性阑尾炎。
Radiol Case Rep. 2025 May 8;20(7):3607-3611. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2025.04.044. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Balancing Between Negative Appendectomy and Complicated Appendicitis: A Persisting Reality Under the Rule of the Uncertainty Principle.阴性阑尾炎与复杂性阑尾炎之间的权衡:不确定性原则下持续存在的现实。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):e81516. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81516. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Periappendiceal Abscess Masquerading as Pyosalpinx: A Case Report and Mini Literature Review of Acute Appendicitis Misdiagnosis.伪装成输卵管积脓的阑尾周围脓肿:一例报告及急性阑尾炎误诊的小型文献综述
Cureus. 2025 Jan 13;17(1):e77364. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77364. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Misses and Near Misses in Paediatric Appendicitis: An Eight-Year, Single-Centre Retrospective Review.小儿阑尾炎的漏诊与险些漏诊:一项为期八年的单中心回顾性研究。
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jul;114(7):1562-1569. doi: 10.1111/apa.17599. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
9
Epidemiology of diagnostic errors in pediatric emergency departments using electronic triggers.使用电子触发工具的儿科急诊科诊断错误流行病学
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):226-245. doi: 10.1111/acem.15087. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
10
Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department.基于机器学习对急诊科急性腹痛患者阑尾炎的预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec 23;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7.
关于使用修订后的更安全诊断工具来帮助衡量和提高诊断安全性的建议。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):315-323. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0012.
4
Diagnostic Decision-Making in the Emergency Department.急诊科的诊断决策
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;65(6):1097-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.07.003.
5
Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis Among Privately Insured Patients.私营医疗保险患者单纯性阑尾炎的非手术治疗。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):141-149. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4282.
6
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety.电子触发工具在提高诊断安全性方面的应用。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):151-159. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008086. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Diagnostic performance of CT for pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis in various clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CT在不同临床环境中对疑似阑尾炎儿科患者的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Dec;25(6):627-637. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1624-9. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
8
Population-level outcomes of early versus delayed appendectomy for acute appendicitis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划比较急性阑尾炎早期与延迟阑尾切除术的人群水平结局。
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 3.
9
Prospective Observational Study on acute Appendicitis Worldwide (POSAW).全球急性阑尾炎前瞻性观察研究(POSAW)。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr 16;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0179-0. eCollection 2018.
10
Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: variation by patient and facility characteristics.急诊科急性心肌梗死的漏诊:因患者和机构特征而异。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2015 Feb 1;2(1):29-40. doi: 10.1515/dx-2014-0053.