Wan S K, Hoff W, Evans T R
Cardiology Department, Royal Free Hospital, London.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1988;11(4):242-53. doi: 10.1185/03007998809114243.
A randomized, double-blind, double-crossover, placebo-controlled haemodynamic study was undertaken in patients with Grade II/III (NYHA) cardiac failure to examine the acute effects of intravenous alifedrine, 20 mg and 40 mg (17 patients), and oral 40 mg alifedrine (8 of these patients). Patients received single doses of alifedrine and placebo on separate days, with invasive monitoring. Alifedrine resulted in a significant (p less than 0.001), dose-dependent increase in cardiac output. The peak effect (+23% with 20 mg i.v., +42% with 40 mg i.v. and +29% with 40 mg orally) was seen approximately 1 hour after intravenous administration (with about half of these increases still apparent at 3 hours) but developed progressively over 3 hours after oral administration. There were significant reductions (p less than 0.001) in peripheral resistance (peak mean changes -21% with 20 mg i.v., -31% with 40 mg i.v. and -23% with 40 mg orally), but little (less than +/- 6%) observed change in arterial pressure. With intravenous alifedrine, there were significant increases in stroke volume (+19% with 20 mg, +35% with 40 mg, p less than 0.001) with little (5%) change in heart rate (+3% and +7%, respectively, N.S.). With the 40 mg oral dose, there was a small increase in heart rate (+12%, p less than 0.005) associated with a 19% (N.S.) increase in stroke volume. Peak haemodynamic responses to 40 mg alifedrine orally were 50% to 75% of those seen after administration of the same dose intravenously. When assessed 3 hours after administration, responses to the two routes of administration were similar. There were no clinically or statistically significant changes in arterial (non-invasive), pulmonary artery, pulmonary capillary or right atrial pressures with any dose of alifedrine. No significant arrhythmias were noted clinically with the doses studied. Alifedrine, therefore, is an interesting agent, available both orally and intravenously, which is well tolerated and appears to produce marked acute increases in cardiac output with little change in heart rate or blood pressure. Further studies should determine whether these effects are maintained during longer-term therapy and clarify the relative contributions of positive inotropic and peripheral vasodilator activity to the effects observed.
对II/III级(纽约心脏协会分级)心力衰竭患者进行了一项随机、双盲、双交叉、安慰剂对照的血流动力学研究,以检验静脉注射20毫克和40毫克阿利非君(17例患者)以及口服40毫克阿利非君(其中8例患者)的急性效应。患者在不同日期接受单剂量的阿利非君和安慰剂,并进行有创监测。阿利非君使心输出量显著(p<0.001)、剂量依赖性增加。静脉注射后约1小时出现峰值效应(20毫克静脉注射时增加23%,40毫克静脉注射时增加42%,40毫克口服时增加29%)(静脉注射3小时后这些增加仍有大约一半明显),但口服给药后3小时内逐渐出现。外周阻力显著降低(p<0.001)(峰值平均变化:20毫克静脉注射时为-21%,40毫克静脉注射时为-31%,40毫克口服时为-23%),但动脉压观察到的变化很小(<±6%)。静脉注射阿利非君时,每搏量显著增加(20毫克时增加19%,40毫克时增加35%,p<0.001),心率变化很小(分别为+3%和+7%,无统计学意义)。口服40毫克剂量时,心率有小幅增加(+12%,p<0.005),每搏量增加19%(无统计学意义)。口服40毫克阿利非君的峰值血流动力学反应为静脉注射相同剂量后观察到的反应的50%至75%。给药3小时后评估时,两种给药途径的反应相似。使用任何剂量的阿利非君,动脉(无创)、肺动脉、肺毛细血管或右心房压力均无临床或统计学上的显著变化。在所研究的剂量下,临床上未观察到明显的心律失常。因此,阿利非君是一种有趣的药物,有口服和静脉注射两种剂型,耐受性良好,似乎能使心输出量显著急性增加,而心率或血压变化很小。进一步的研究应确定这些效应在长期治疗期间是否持续,并阐明正性肌力作用和外周血管舒张活性对观察到的效应的相对贡献。