• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科安全网错误的频率:患者交接的影响。

Frequency of safety net errors in the emergency department: Effect of patient handoffs.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, Fifth Third Faculty Office Building, 3rd Floor Emergency Medicine Office, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.

Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, Fifth Third Faculty Office Building, 3rd Floor Emergency Medicine Office, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:188-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.023
PMID:32151369
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine physician awareness of abnormal vital signs and key clinical interventions (oxygen provision, intravenous access) in the emergency department, and to measure the effect of patient handoffs on this awareness.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study at two large, urban, academic emergency departments. Emergency department physicians were asked the following about each of the physician's patients: 1) the number of IV lines, 2) whether the patient was on supplemental oxygen, and 3) whether the patient had any abnormal vital signs. Physicians were blind to the nature of the study prior to enrollment. Error rates between physician responses and actual patient status were calculated, and logistic regression, adjusted for physician clustering, was used to calculate association of errors with multiple situational factors, including handoff status.

RESULTS

We analyzed 463 patient encounters from 74 physicians. Physicians missed abnormal vital signs in 19.4% of encounters. They made errors in oxygen status and number of IV lines in 16.6% and 35.8% of encounters, respectively. Physicians were significantly more likely to make all types of errors on patients who had undergone handoff as opposed to their primary patients.

CONCLUSION

Emergency physicians make frequent errors regarding awareness of their patients' vital signs, oxygen and vascular status and patient handoffs are associated with an increased frequency of such errors.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定急诊医师对异常生命体征和关键临床干预措施(供氧、静脉通路建立)的知晓情况,并衡量患者交接班对这种知晓情况的影响。

方法

这是在两家大型城市学术急诊部门进行的前瞻性观察性研究。向每位医师的每位患者询问以下问题:1)静脉置管数,2)患者是否接受补充氧疗,以及 3)患者是否存在任何异常生命体征。在入组前,医师对研究的性质不知情。根据医师聚类情况,使用逻辑回归计算错误率与多种情境因素(包括交接班状态)之间的关联,并对错误率进行校正。

结果

我们分析了 74 名医师的 463 例患者就诊情况。医师在 19.4%的就诊中遗漏了异常生命体征。他们在氧气状态和静脉置管数方面的错误发生率分别为 16.6%和 35.8%。与主管患者相比,接受交接班的患者的医师更有可能出现所有类型的错误。

结论

急诊医师在对患者生命体征、氧气和血管状态的意识方面经常出现错误,且患者交接班与这类错误的发生频率增加有关。

相似文献

1
Frequency of safety net errors in the emergency department: Effect of patient handoffs.急诊科安全网错误的频率:患者交接的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:188-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
2
Communication of Vital Signs at Emergency Department Handoff: Opportunities for Improvement.急诊科交接班时生命体征的传达:改进的机会。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;66(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Interunit handoffs from emergency department to inpatient care: A cross-sectional survey of physicians at a university medical center.从急诊科到住院治疗的科室间交接:对一所大学医学中心医生的横断面调查。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Nov;10(11):711-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2431. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
4
Quantitative Analysis of the Content of EMS Handoff of Critically Ill and Injured Patients to the Emergency Department.危重伤病患者急诊医疗服务交接内容的定量分析
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):14-17. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1194930. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
ED handoffs: observed practices and communication errors.ED 交接班:观察到的实践和沟通错误。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;29(5):502-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
6
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.交接方案实施后医疗差错的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1803-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1405556.
7
A novel briefing checklist at shift handoff in an emergency department improves situational awareness and safety event identification.急诊科交接班时使用的一种新型简报清单可提高态势感知和安全事件识别能力。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Apr;31(4):231-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000194.
8
A Video-Based Study of Emergency Medical Services Handoffs to a Pediatric Emergency Department.基于视频的儿科急诊急救医疗服务交接研究。
J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;65(2):e101-e110. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.04.011. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
9
Eastern association for the surgery of trauma - quality, patient safety, and outcomes committee - transitions of care: healthcare handoffs in trauma.东部创伤外科学会-质量、患者安全和结果委员会-交接:创伤中的医疗交接。
Am J Surg. 2021 Sep;222(3):521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.01.034. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
Resident to resident handoffs in the emergency department: an observational study.急诊科住院医师之间的交接班:一项观察性研究。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;47(5):573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.027. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of Electronic Health Record Patterns of Emergency Physicians-Charting the Digital Burden.急诊医生电子健康记录模式探索——描绘数字负担
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429749. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29749.