Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, Fifth Third Faculty Office Building, 3rd Floor Emergency Medicine Office, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.
Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, Fifth Third Faculty Office Building, 3rd Floor Emergency Medicine Office, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:188-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
The objective of this study was to determine physician awareness of abnormal vital signs and key clinical interventions (oxygen provision, intravenous access) in the emergency department, and to measure the effect of patient handoffs on this awareness.
This was a prospective observational study at two large, urban, academic emergency departments. Emergency department physicians were asked the following about each of the physician's patients: 1) the number of IV lines, 2) whether the patient was on supplemental oxygen, and 3) whether the patient had any abnormal vital signs. Physicians were blind to the nature of the study prior to enrollment. Error rates between physician responses and actual patient status were calculated, and logistic regression, adjusted for physician clustering, was used to calculate association of errors with multiple situational factors, including handoff status.
We analyzed 463 patient encounters from 74 physicians. Physicians missed abnormal vital signs in 19.4% of encounters. They made errors in oxygen status and number of IV lines in 16.6% and 35.8% of encounters, respectively. Physicians were significantly more likely to make all types of errors on patients who had undergone handoff as opposed to their primary patients.
Emergency physicians make frequent errors regarding awareness of their patients' vital signs, oxygen and vascular status and patient handoffs are associated with an increased frequency of such errors.
本研究旨在确定急诊医师对异常生命体征和关键临床干预措施(供氧、静脉通路建立)的知晓情况,并衡量患者交接班对这种知晓情况的影响。
这是在两家大型城市学术急诊部门进行的前瞻性观察性研究。向每位医师的每位患者询问以下问题:1)静脉置管数,2)患者是否接受补充氧疗,以及 3)患者是否存在任何异常生命体征。在入组前,医师对研究的性质不知情。根据医师聚类情况,使用逻辑回归计算错误率与多种情境因素(包括交接班状态)之间的关联,并对错误率进行校正。
我们分析了 74 名医师的 463 例患者就诊情况。医师在 19.4%的就诊中遗漏了异常生命体征。他们在氧气状态和静脉置管数方面的错误发生率分别为 16.6%和 35.8%。与主管患者相比,接受交接班的患者的医师更有可能出现所有类型的错误。
急诊医师在对患者生命体征、氧气和血管状态的意识方面经常出现错误,且患者交接班与这类错误的发生频率增加有关。