• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于选择经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)候选者的20%逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)临界值的临床价值:一项单中心队列研究分析

Clinical value of the 20% logistic EuroSCORE cut-off for selecting TAVI candidates: a single-centre cohort study analysis.

作者信息

Imnadze Guram, Hofmann Steffen, Billion Michael, Ferdosi Abbas, Kowalski Marek, Rajab Ehab, Bramlage Karin, Bramlage Peter, Warnecke Henning, Franz Norbert

机构信息

Institut für Gesundheitsforschung und Bildung, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Schüchtermann Clinic, Bad Rothenfelde, Germany.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2020 Feb 19;7(1):e001194. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001194. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2019-001194
PMID:32153791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7046969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (logEuroSCORE) ≥20% is frequently recognised as a finite criteria for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) reimbursement, despite guideline modifications to reflect the appropriacy of TAVI in selected lower-risk patients. The aim was to evaluate the clinical value of this threshold cut-off in TAVI patients and to identify factors associated with mortality in those below this threshold.

METHODS

We analysed data from a single-centre, German, observational, TAVI-patient registry, gathered between 2008 and 2016. Patients were stratified by logEuroSCORE (≥ or <20%) for comparisons. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of mortality at 1 year, with this analysis used to generate a calculated ('real') risk value for each patient.

RESULTS

1679 patients (logEuroSCORE <20%: n=789; logEuroSCORE ≥20%: n=890) were included. LogEuroSCORE <20% patients were significantly younger (80.1 vs 81.6 years; p<0.001) and less comorbid than logEuroSCORE ≥20% patients, with a higher rate of transfemoral TAVI (35.6% vs 26.1%; p<0.001) and predilation (70.0% vs 63.3%; p=0.004). Patients with a logEuroSCORE <20% experienced more vascular complications (3.4% vs 1.5%; p=0.010). One-year survival was 88.3% in the logEuroSCORE <20% and 81.8% in the logEuroSCORE ≥20% group (p=0.005), with the calculated mortality risk falling within 2% of the logEuroSCORE in just 12.9% of patients. In the logEuroSCORE <20% group, only coronary artery disease was significantly predictive of 1-year mortality (OR 2.408; 95% CI 1.361 to 4.262; p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, patients with a logEuroSCORE <20% selected for TAVI have excellent outcomes. The decision not to reimburse TAVI in such patients may be viewed as inappropriate.

摘要

背景

尽管指南已修改以反映经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)在部分低风险患者中的适用性,但欧洲心脏手术风险评估逻辑系统(logEuroSCORE)≥20%仍常被视为TAVI报销的限定标准。本研究旨在评估该阈值在TAVI患者中的临床价值,并确定低于该阈值患者的死亡相关因素。

方法

我们分析了2008年至2016年间收集的来自德国单中心TAVI患者观察性注册研究的数据。根据logEuroSCORE(≥或<20%)对患者进行分层以进行比较。进行逻辑回归分析以确定1年死亡率的预测因素,该分析用于为每位患者生成计算得出的(“实际”)风险值。

结果

共纳入1679例患者(logEuroSCORE<20%:n = 789;logEuroSCORE≥20%:n = 890)。logEuroSCORE<20%的患者比logEuroSCORE≥20%的患者明显更年轻(80.1岁对81.6岁;p<0.001)且合并症更少,经股动脉TAVI率更高(35.6%对26.1%;p<0.001)以及预扩张率更高(70.0%对63.3%;p = 0.004)。logEuroSCORE<20%的患者发生血管并发症更多(3.4%对1.5%;p = 0.010)。logEuroSCORE<20%组的1年生存率为88.3%,logEuroSCORE≥20%组为81.8%(p = 0.005),仅12.9%的患者计算得出的死亡风险在logEuroSCORE的2%范围内。在logEuroSCORE<20%组中,仅冠状动脉疾病是1年死亡率的显著预测因素(OR 2.408;95%CI 1.361至4.262;p = 0.003)。

结论

在我们机构,选择进行TAVI的logEuroSCORE<20%的患者预后良好。对这类患者不报销TAVI的决定可能被视为不合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/a2b6d574238f/openhrt-2019-001194f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/e1af7db553b1/openhrt-2019-001194f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/be922b301530/openhrt-2019-001194f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/a2b6d574238f/openhrt-2019-001194f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/e1af7db553b1/openhrt-2019-001194f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/be922b301530/openhrt-2019-001194f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcaf/7046969/a2b6d574238f/openhrt-2019-001194f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical value of the 20% logistic EuroSCORE cut-off for selecting TAVI candidates: a single-centre cohort study analysis.用于选择经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)候选者的20%逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)临界值的临床价值:一项单中心队列研究分析
Open Heart. 2020 Feb 19;7(1):e001194. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001194. eCollection 2020.
2
Computed tomography predictors of mortality, stroke and conduction disturbances in women undergoing TAVR: A sub-analysis of the WIN-TAVI registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者死亡率、卒中和传导障碍的计算机断层扫描预测因素:WIN-TAVI 注册研究的亚分析。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jul-Aug;12(4):338-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
3
Factors influencing the choice between transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients younger than 80 years: Results from the OBSERVANT study.影响 80 岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与手术治疗选择的因素:来自 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):E186-E195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28447. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
4
1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the First WIN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后女性 1 年的临床结局:来自首个 WIN-TAVI 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.034.
5
Five-year follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for symptomatic aortic stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的五年随访
Heart. 2017 Dec;103(24):1970-1976. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-311004. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation - results from the CGA-TAVI multicentre registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的综合老年评估——CGA-TAVI多中心注册研究结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jan 4;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0740-x.
7
Post procedural risk assessment in patients undergoing trans aortic valve implantation according to the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction-7 score: Advantages of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction-7 in stratification of post-procedural outcome.经主动脉瓣植入术后患者的年龄、肌酐和射血分数-7 评分的术后风险评估:年龄、肌酐和射血分数-7 在术后结局分层中的优势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):141-148. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27806. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
8
Hemodynamic classification of paravalvular leakage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with angiographic or echocardiographic classification for prediction of 1-year mortality.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣周漏的血流动力学分类与血管造影或超声心动图分类对1年死亡率预测的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 1;91(6):E56-E63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27384. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Deceleration capacity of heart rate predicts 1-year mortality of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.心率减速能力可预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的1年死亡率。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):919-924. doi: 10.1002/clc.22748. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
10
Evaluation of length of stay after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN 3 prosthesis: A French multicentre prospective observational trial.SAPIEN 3 假体经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后住院时间评估:一项法国多中心前瞻性观察性试验。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jun-Jul;113(6-7):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation at a high-volume center: the Bad Rothenfelde experience.
高容量中心的经导管主动脉瓣植入术:巴特-罗滕费尔德经验
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2017 Dec;14(4):215-224. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2017.72224. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a low ejection fraction.射血分数降低患者的经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Feb 1;26(2):224-229. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx315.
5
The German Aortic Valve Score II.德国主动脉瓣评分 II.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov 1;52(5):881-887. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx282.
6
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
7
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低-中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的系统评价和Meta分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Jun;29(6):209-216.
8
Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.中危患者的外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1321-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: epidemiology, timing, predictors, and outcome.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的心房颤动:流行病学、时间、预测因素和结果。
Eur Heart J. 2017 May 1;38(17):1285-1293. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw456.
10
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis.低中风险重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5130.