Shinozaki Nana, Wang Han-Chieh, Yuan Xiaoyi, Li Tianyu, Asano Kana, Kobayashi Satomi, Sasaki Satoshi
1Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
2Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
BMC Nutr. 2019 Feb 12;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s40795-019-0275-x. eCollection 2019.
Although the importance of capacity building for public health nutrition (PHN) has been increasing globally, reports on the current status of training programs for PHN in East-Asia including Japan are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the current status of education and research activities in the field of PHN in Japan with those in South Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China.
Necessary information was collected by internet search and telephone inquiry. Collection focused on the number of departments in colleges and universities with PHN as a compulsory subject in the 2016 academic year, and the number of articles and information related to these articles published in the journal between 2007 and 2016.
The number of departments with PHN as a compulsory subject was the highest in Japan ( = 137), followed by mainland China ( = 32), Taiwan ( = 18) and South Korea ( = 7). Using the classification list of education in each country and region, the majority of these departments were classified as home economics, natural science, health and welfare, and medical science in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, respectively. Regarding publications, most of the articles were written in colleges and universities not having PHN as a compulsory subject in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. The number of articles per department among departments with compulsory PHN education was lowest in Japan ( = 0.3) compared to Taiwan, mainland China, and South Korea ( = 1.2, 2.7, and 3.7, respectively).
Japan has a much higher number of departments with PHN as a compulsory subject than neighboring East Asian states and relatively low research activities in the field of PHN. This suggests that current university education may not lead to active PHN research in Japan. Further studies are warranted to explore the reasons for this.
尽管全球范围内公共卫生营养(PHN)能力建设的重要性日益增加,但关于包括日本在内的东亚地区PHN培训项目现状的报告却很有限。本研究的目的是比较日本与韩国、台湾地区和中国大陆在PHN领域的教育和研究活动现状。
通过互联网搜索和电话查询收集必要信息。收集的重点是2016学年将PHN作为必修课的高校院系数量,以及2007年至2016年期间在该期刊上发表的与这些文章相关的文章数量和信息。
将PHN作为必修课的院系数量在日本最多(=137),其次是中国大陆(=32)、台湾地区(=18)和韩国(=7)。根据每个国家和地区的教育分类清单,在日本、韩国、台湾地区和中国大陆,这些院系大多分别归类为家政学、自然科学、健康与福利以及医学。关于出版物,在日本、韩国和台湾地区,大多数文章是由未将PHN作为必修课的高校撰写的。与台湾地区、中国大陆和韩国(分别为=1.2、2.7和3.7)相比,在有PHN必修教育的院系中,日本每个院系的文章数量最低(=0.3)。
日本将PHN作为必修课的院系数量比东亚邻国多得多,而在PHN领域的研究活动相对较少。这表明目前的大学教育可能无法在日本引发积极的PHN研究。有必要进一步研究以探究其原因。