Neshteruk Cody D, Mazzucca Stephanie, Vaughn Amber E, Jones Deborah J, Ward Dianne S
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Feb 20;18:101068. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101068. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Although physical activity and screen time parenting practices influence children's behaviors, little work has examined how these practices work in combination. The purpose of this study was to identify patterns of physical activity and screen time parenting practices, and examine differences in preschool children's physical activity, sedentary behavior, and adiposity among the identified patterns. Data were collected in 2009-2012 from 319 parent-child dyads enrolled in a randomized trial testing a parent-focused obesity prevention intervention. At baseline, physical activity and screen time parenting practices were assessed using a validated self-report survey. Children's physical activity and sedentary behavior were measured using accelerometers and child anthropometrics were objectively measured. Latent profile analyses identified patterns of physical activity and screen time parenting practices. Differences in child outcomes were tested among the identified classes. Three parent classes were identified: Rewarders ( = 165), Activity Supportive ( = 98), and Screen Time Permissive ( = 56). Rewarder parents were characterized by the highest scores on using physical activity and screen time to reward or control children's behavior. Activity Supportive parents generally had the highest scores on practices to promote physical activity, while Screen Time Permissive parents had the highest scores on practices facilitating screen time. There were no differences in the mean child physical activity, sedentary behavior or BMI z-score among the three classes. Findings revealed distinct classes of parents that could provide modifiable targets for family-based physical activity promotion, but more work is needed examining the influence of these patterns longitudinally and in different populations.
尽管体育活动和屏幕时间育儿方式会影响孩子的行为,但很少有研究探讨这些方式如何相互作用。本研究的目的是识别体育活动和屏幕时间育儿方式的模式,并研究在这些已识别模式下学龄前儿童的体育活动、久坐行为和肥胖程度的差异。2009年至2012年期间,从319对参与一项以家长为重点的肥胖预防干预随机试验的亲子对中收集了数据。在基线时,使用经过验证的自我报告调查评估体育活动和屏幕时间育儿方式。使用加速度计测量儿童的体育活动和久坐行为,并客观测量儿童人体测量数据。潜在剖面分析识别了体育活动和屏幕时间育儿方式的模式。在已识别的类别中测试儿童结果的差异。确定了三类家长:奖励型(n = 165)、支持体育活动型(n = 98)和允许屏幕时间型(n = 56)。奖励型家长的特点是在使用体育活动和屏幕时间奖励或控制孩子行为方面得分最高。支持体育活动型家长在促进体育活动的做法上得分通常最高,而允许屏幕时间型家长在促进屏幕时间的做法上得分最高。这三类家长在儿童平均体育活动、久坐行为或BMI z评分方面没有差异。研究结果揭示了不同类型的家长,可为基于家庭的体育活动促进提供可改变的目标,但需要更多工作纵向研究这些模式在不同人群中的影响。