Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Ilsan, South Korea.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Jun;34(6):e23242. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23242. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Although plasma free hemoglobin (fHb) test is important for assessing intravascular hemolysis, it is still dependent on the gold standard Harboe method using manual and labor-intensive spectrometric measurements at the wavelength of 380-415-450 nm. We established an automated fHb assay using a routine chemistry autoanalyzer that can be tuned to a wavelength of 380-416-450 nm.
The linearity, precision, accuracy, correlation, and sample carryover of fHb measurement using TBA200FRneo method and manual Harboe method were evaluated, respectively. fHb values measured by manual Harboe method were compared with those measured by our new automated TBA200FRneo method.
fHb measurements were linear in the range of 0.0538.75 µmol/L by TBA200FRneo and 0.059.69 µmol/L by manual Harboe method. Imprecision analysis (%CV) revealed 0.92.8% for TBA200FRneo method and 5.313.6% for the manual Harboe method. Comparison analysis showed 0.9986 of correlation coefficient (TBA200FRneo = 0.970 × Harboe + 0.12). In analytical accuracy analysis, the manual Harboe method revealed about 4 times higher average total error % (12.2%) than the TBA200FRneo automated method (2.8%). The sample carryover was -0.0016% in TBA200FRneo method and 0.0038% in Harboe method.
In the measurement of fHb, the automated TBA200FRneo method showed better performance than the conventional Harboe method. It is expected that the automated fHb assay using the routine chemistry analyzer can replace the gold standard Harboe method which is labor-intensive and need an independent spectrophotometry equipment.
虽然血浆游离血红蛋白(fHb)检测对于评估血管内溶血很重要,但它仍然依赖于 Harboe 金标准方法,该方法使用手动和劳动密集型分光光度法在 380-415-450nm 波长下进行测量。我们建立了一种使用常规化学自动分析仪的自动化 fHb 检测方法,该方法可以调谐到 380-416-450nm 波长。
分别评估 TBA200FRneo 方法和手动 Harboe 方法测量 fHb 的线性、精密度、准确性、相关性和样品携带。手动 Harboe 方法测量的 fHb 值与我们新的自动化 TBA200FRneo 方法测量的 fHb 值进行比较。
TBA200FRneo 方法测量 fHb 的线性范围为 0.0538.75µmol/L,手动 Harboe 方法为 0.059.69µmol/L。精密度分析(%CV)显示 TBA200FRneo 方法为 0.92.8%,手动 Harboe 方法为 5.313.6%。比较分析显示相关系数为 0.9986(TBA200FRneo=0.970×Harboe+0.12)。在分析准确性分析中,手动 Harboe 方法的平均总误差%(12.2%)比 TBA200FRneo 自动化方法(2.8%)高约 4 倍。TBA200FRneo 方法的样品携带为-0.0016%,Harboe 方法为 0.0038%。
在 fHb 测量中,自动化 TBA200FRneo 方法的性能优于传统的 Harboe 方法。预计使用常规化学分析仪的自动化 fHb 检测可以替代劳动密集型且需要独立分光光度计设备的 Harboe 金标准方法。