Suppr超能文献

积极语言和专业程度对在线健康建议中可信度和可靠性的影响:实验研究

Effects of Positive Language and Profession on Trustworthiness and Credibility in Online Health Advice: Experimental Study.

作者信息

König Lars, Jucks Regina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 10;22(3):e16685. doi: 10.2196/16685.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When searching for health information, many people use the internet as their first source of information. In online health forums, for example, users post their questions and exchange health advice. In recent years, information givers from various professions have begun to use positive language (indicated by the frequent use of positively valenced adjectives) to communicate their information and persuade their audiences.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the current study was to answer the following research questions: (1) How does positive language, in comparison to neutral language, influence the trustworthiness of a person arguing in an online health forum and the credibility of their health claims; (2) How does working for a university, compared to working for a lobbying organization, influence the trustworthiness of a person arguing in an online health forum and the credibility of their health claims; and (3) Do the two factors of language style and professional affiliation interact with each other to influence trustworthiness and credibility judgments?

METHODS

In a 2 × 2 between-subject experiment, 242 participants read a post from an online health forum and subsequently rated the trustworthiness of the forum post author and the credibility of their information. Within the post, the professional affiliation (scientist vs lobbyist) and language style (neutral vs positive) of the forum post author was varied.

RESULTS

When the forum post author used a positive language style, they were perceived as less trustworthy (high Machiavellianism [P<.001; η=.076], low Integrity [P=.001; η=.045], and low Benevolence [P=.02; η=.025]) and their information was perceived as less credible (low Message Credibility [P=.001; η=.045]). The professional affiliation of the forum post author did not influence their trustworthiness or the credibility of their information.

CONCLUSIONS

When searching for health information, information seekers evaluate the language style of forum posts to decide whether forum post authors are trustworthy and their information is credible.

摘要

背景

在寻找健康信息时,许多人将互联网作为首要信息来源。例如,在在线健康论坛上,用户会发布问题并交流健康建议。近年来,来自各种职业的信息提供者开始使用积极语言(以频繁使用具有积极情感色彩的形容词为标志)来传达信息并说服受众。

目的

本研究的目标是回答以下研究问题:(1)与中性语言相比,积极语言如何影响在在线健康论坛上进行论证的人的可信度以及他们健康主张的可信度;(2)与为游说组织工作相比,在大学工作如何影响在在线健康论坛上进行论证的人的可信度以及他们健康主张的可信度;以及(3)语言风格和职业归属这两个因素是否相互作用以影响可信度和可靠性判断?

方法

在一项2×2组间实验中,242名参与者阅读了一篇来自在线健康论坛的帖子,随后对论坛帖子作者的可信度及其信息的可信度进行评分。在帖子中,论坛帖子作者的职业归属(科学家与游说者)和语言风格(中性与积极)有所不同。

结果

当论坛帖子作者使用积极语言风格时,他们被认为可信度较低(高马基雅维利主义[P<.001;η=.076],低正直性[P=.001;η=.045],低仁慈性[P=.02;η=.025]),并且他们的信息被认为可信度较低(低信息可信度[P=.001;η=.045])。论坛帖子作者的职业归属并未影响他们的可信度或其信息的可信度。

结论

在寻找健康信息时,信息寻求者会评估论坛帖子的语言风格,以确定论坛帖子作者是否值得信赖以及他们的信息是否可信。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验