Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Nord 59300, France.
System Science, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342037, India.
J Biomech Eng. 2020 Sep 1;142(9). doi: 10.1115/1.4046636.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether parameters from an instrumented one-leg stance (OLS) on a force plate could provide relevant information related to fall risk in older people. Forty-two community dwelling older people including 17 fallers and 25 nonfallers, and 25 young subjects performed a OLS while standing on a force plate, with parameters related to transferring weight onto one leg and postural sway in singe-leg stance evaluated. No differences were observed between older fallers and nonfallers and the younger participants for any of the weight transfer parameters. The younger participants were able to reduce their postural sway during the OLS test after the first 0-2 s period, unlike older participants who swayed the same amount throughout the test. The older fallers swayed significantly more than both nonfallers and younger participants throughout the 10-s of OLS evaluated. When the tests were used to classify older participants as fallers, the instrumented OLS achieved 100% accuracy, compared to 69.0% classification accuracy for the five times sit-to-stand test, 61.9% for the standard OLS, and 47.6% for the timed-up-and-go test. These findings suggest that the standard OLS test might not be suitable to detect fall risk. In contrast, an instrumented version of the OLS could provide valuable additional information that could identify older fallers. Future work will include a prospective study of the instrumented OLS in a larger population of older people.
本研究旨在探讨在测力台上进行单腿站立(OLS)的仪器参数是否能提供与老年人跌倒风险相关的信息。42 名社区居住的老年人(包括 17 名跌倒者和 25 名非跌倒者)和 25 名年轻受试者在测力台上进行 OLS,评估与单腿承重和单腿站立姿势摆动相关的参数。在任何重量转移参数方面,老年人跌倒者和非跌倒者与年轻参与者之间均无差异。与老年人相比,年轻参与者在 OLS 测试的前 0-2s 期间能够减少姿势摆动,而老年人在整个测试期间摆动幅度相同。在整个 10s 的 OLS 评估中,老年人跌倒者的摆动幅度明显大于非跌倒者和年轻参与者。当使用这些测试将老年人参与者分类为跌倒者时,仪器化 OLS 的准确率为 100%,而五次坐立测试的准确率为 69.0%,标准 OLS 的准确率为 61.9%,计时起立行走测试的准确率为 47.6%。这些发现表明,标准 OLS 测试可能不适合检测跌倒风险。相比之下,OLS 的仪器化版本可以提供有价值的额外信息,从而识别老年人跌倒者。未来的工作将包括在更大的老年人人群中进行仪器化 OLS 的前瞻性研究。