Zhou Hua, Binmadi Nada O, Yang Ying-Hua, Proia Patrizia, Basile John R
Department of Oncology and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Maryland Dental School, 650 West Baltimore Street, 7-North, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Department of Oral Basic and Clinical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Angiogenesis. 2020 May;23(2):267. doi: 10.1007/s10456-020-09709-x.
The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article [1] following an investigation by the University of Maryland. The institution found that in Figures 1B and 1D, the cell lines are different and all published histograms show SEMA4D mRNA level whereas Excel data have two histograms showing SEMA4D expression and two histograms showing VEGF expression. In Figure 2B, the metadata for one image shows different treatment conditions than those reported in the article. The published image labelled "VEGF + VEGFR-2 shRNA" has a metadata label of S4d-plexinB1 shRNA2". In Figure 2E, statistical significance was shown in the published figure for four comparisons, but upon recalculation, one comparison noted as significant was not. In Figure 6A, the lower left image is labelled "VEGF shRNA" in the published figure, but the metadata label is "S4DshRNA-HN121-20X". In Figure 6C, specifically, within columns 2-4, for each antibody used for immunocytochemistry, the three images have been swapped so that the original images do not match the shRNA labels in the figure (the labels for the two antibodies were correct). In Figure 7D, the first published image is labelled as "IgG" in the paper, but the metadata show a label of "Restore (V+S).tif". The third published image has a label of "anti-VEGF IgG", and the metadata show a label of "con sh.tif". Due to these errors, the Editors-in-Chief have found that the results are no longer reliable.
在马里兰大学进行调查后,主编撤回了这篇文章[1]。该机构发现,在图1B和1D中,细胞系不同,所有发表的柱状图显示的是SEMA4D mRNA水平,而Excel数据中有两个柱状图显示SEMA4D表达,两个柱状图显示VEGF表达。在图2B中,一张图像的元数据显示的处理条件与文章中报道的不同。发表的标记为“VEGF + VEGFR-2 shRNA”的图像的元数据标签为“S4d-plexinB1 shRNA2”。在图2E中,发表的图中显示了四项比较的统计学显著性,但重新计算后,一项标注为显著的比较并非如此。在图6A中,发表的图中左下方的图像标记为“VEGF shRNA”,但其元数据标签为“S4DshRNA-HN121-20X”。具体而言,在图6C中,在第2 - 4列内,用于免疫细胞化学的每种抗体对应的三张图像被交换了,因此原始图像与图中的shRNA标签不匹配(两种抗体的标签是正确的)。在图7D中,发表的第一张图像在论文中标记为“IgG”,但其元数据显示的标签为“Restore (V+S).tif”。发表的第三张图像标记为“anti-VEGF IgG”,其元数据显示的标签为“con sh.tif”。由于这些错误,主编认为结果不再可靠。