Hall Jill J, Eurich Dean T, Nagy Danielle, Tjosvold Lisa, Gamble John-Michael
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3-236 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1849-1860. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05731-3. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Prior meta-analyses measuring thiazide-induced glycemic change have demonstrated an increased risk of incident diabetes; however, this measure's definition has changed over time.
To determine the magnitude of change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for thiazide diuretics.
A research librarian designed and conducted searches in Medline®, EMBASE, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception through July 2018) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (inception to December 2014).
Randomized, controlled trials comparing a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic to any comparator reporting FPG were identified. Trials enrolling < 50 participants, those with a follow-up period of < 4 weeks, and conference abstracts were excluded.
Independent duplicate screening of citations and full-text articles, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias was conducted.
Ninety-five studies were included (N = 76,608 participants), with thiazides compared with placebo, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors, potassium-sparing diuretic, and others alone or in combination. Thiazide diuretics marginally increased FPG (weighted mean difference 0.20 mmol/L (95% CI 0.15-0.25); I = 84%) (1 mmol/L = 18 mg/dL). Results did not change substantially when considering dose or duration, comparing thiazides with placebo or an active comparator, or using thiazides as monotherapy or combination therapy, even when combined with a potassium-correcting agent.
Thiazide diuretics have a small and clinically unimportant impact on FPG.
既往测量噻嗪类药物引起血糖变化的荟萃分析表明,新发糖尿病风险增加;然而,该指标的定义随时间发生了变化。
确定噻嗪类利尿剂导致的空腹血糖(FPG)变化幅度。
一名研究馆员在医学期刊数据库(Medline®)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、循证医学评价-考克兰对照试验中心注册库(截至2018年7月)以及国际药学文摘数据库(截至2014年12月)中进行了检索。
纳入比较噻嗪类或噻嗪样利尿剂与任何对照并报告FPG的随机对照试验。排除入组人数<50例的试验、随访期<4周的试验以及会议摘要。
对文献和全文文章进行独立的重复筛选、数据提取以及偏倚风险评估。
纳入95项研究(N = 76,608名参与者),将噻嗪类药物与安慰剂、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂、肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂、保钾利尿剂以及其他药物单独或联合使用进行比较。噻嗪类利尿剂使FPG略有升高(加权平均差0.20 mmol/L(95%CI 0.15 - 0.25);I² = 84%)(1 mmol/L = 18 mg/dL)。在考虑剂量或疗程、将噻嗪类药物与安慰剂或活性对照进行比较、使用噻嗪类药物作为单药治疗或联合治疗时,即使与补钾药物联合使用,结果也没有实质性变化。
噻嗪类利尿剂对FPG的影响较小,临床意义不大。