Suppr超能文献

增加钙通道阻滞剂剂量与在未控制的高血压治疗方案中添加利尿剂的效果比较。

The effects of increasing calcium channel blocker dose vs. adding a diuretic to treatment regimens for patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Center, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2017 Oct 5;40(10):892-898. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.56. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

Abstract

In patients with insufficient blood pressure (BP) control, despite using a combination regimen containing an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), whether a greater dose of CCB or adding a diuretic is more effective at lowering BP remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of switching from the daily administration of a single-pill fixed-dose combination of irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) to irbesartan (100 mg) with an increased dose of amlodipine (10 mg) (HD group, n=62) or irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) with 1 mg of indapamide (D group, n=63) in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. BP measured at home was monitored by a physician using a telemonitoring system. Between the HD and D groups, no significant differences were observed in morning home BP changes (mean reduction of systolic/diastolic BP, 1.7/0.9 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals, -2.4 to 5.7/-1.4 to 3.2; P=0.19/0.37), achievement rate of target BP (45.2% vs. 42.9%, P=0.80), BP variability independent of the mean (P⩾0.74), other variability indices (P⩾0.55) and time to stabilization, which was calculated using a fitted analysis (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.99). Although a significant increase in serum uric acid was observed in the D group (P<0.0001), neither clinically relevant abnormal laboratory test results nor critical BP changes were observed throughout the trial period. Both antihypertensive drug combination strategies were effective treatment options. Further investigation is required to determine the appropriate use of both therapies based on the various pathologies associated with hypertension.

摘要

在血压(BP)控制不佳的患者中,尽管使用了包含血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的联合治疗方案,但增加 CCB 剂量或添加利尿剂在降低 BP 方面更有效尚不清楚。我们进行了一项多中心随机临床试验,比较了将每日服用的厄贝沙坦(100mg)和氨氯地平(5mg)固定剂量单片复方制剂转换为厄贝沙坦(100mg)联合增加剂量的氨氯地平(10mg)(HD 组,n=62)或厄贝沙坦(100mg)和氨氯地平(5mg)联合吲达帕胺(1mg)(D 组,n=63)在血压控制不佳的患者中的疗效。通过远程监测系统,由医生监测家庭血压。在 HD 组和 D 组之间,家庭早晨血压变化(收缩压/舒张压平均降低幅度,1.7/0.9mmHg;95%置信区间,-2.4 至 5.7/-1.4 至 3.2;P=0.19/0.37)、目标血压达标率(45.2%比 42.9%,P=0.80)、血压均值独立的变异性(P⩾0.74)、其他变异性指数(P⩾0.55)以及使用拟合分析计算的稳定时间(13.1 天比 11.4 天,P=0.99)均无显著差异。尽管 D 组血清尿酸显著升高(P<0.0001),但整个试验期间均未观察到临床相关的异常实验室检查结果或临界 BP 变化。两种降压药物联合治疗策略均为有效治疗选择。需要进一步研究以确定根据与高血压相关的各种病理状况适当使用这两种治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验