Chan Jonathan Cheuk-Hung, Chow Shing Chuen, Lai Jimmy Shiu-Ming
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 22;14:197-204. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S228910. eCollection 2020.
To compare the efficacy and safety of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using either the long duration or short duration protocol.
Retrospective series of 23 consecutive patients with glaucoma who underwent continuous-wave diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation from August 2016 to July 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Laser pulse duration for the long and short duration protocols was defined as 3.0-4.0 and 1.5-2.0 s, respectively.
There were 15 male and 8 female Chinese subjects (23 eyes), age 49-90 (71.3 ± 2.7), with 10 subjects that underwent long duration cyclophotocoagulation (power 1239.2 ± 78.3 mW, spots 13.9 ± 1.4) and 13 subjects that had short duration cyclophotocoagulation (mean power 1817.3 ± 85.7 mW, spots 14.4 ± 1.0). Six months after long and short duration cyclophotocoagulation, intraocular pressure decreased significantly from 29.9 ± 7.8 to 21.1 ± 6.5 (p < 0.01), and from 35.4 ± 2.7 to 24.1 ± 3.4 (p = 0.04), respectively, while glaucoma medications decreased significantly by 1.4 ± 0.5 (p = 0.02) in the long duration group only. Reduction of medications after short duration cyclophotocoagulation was less and did not reach statistical significance (0.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.15). There was no significant difference of visual deterioration and complication rates.
Both types of cyclophotocoagulation were equally effective in lowering intraocular pressure by 6 months, but the short duration protocol, using higher laser power, was able to achieve a greater and earlier reduction, at 3 months. However, the long duration protocol, using less laser power, appears better at reducing medication requirement by 6 months.
比较采用长脉冲持续时间方案和短脉冲持续时间方案的二极管激光经巩膜睫状体光凝术的疗效和安全性。
回顾性研究系列,纳入2016年8月至2018年7月在香港一家三级医院接受连续波二极管激光经巩膜睫状体光凝术的23例青光眼患者。长脉冲持续时间方案和短脉冲持续时间方案的激光脉冲持续时间分别定义为3.0 - 4.0秒和1.5 - 2.0秒。
有15例男性和8例女性中国受试者(23只眼),年龄49 - 90岁(71.3±2.7岁),其中10例接受长脉冲持续时间睫状体光凝术(功率1239.2±78.3毫瓦,光斑13.9±1.4个),13例接受短脉冲持续时间睫状体光凝术(平均功率1817.3±85.7毫瓦,光斑14.4±1.0个)。长脉冲持续时间和短脉冲持续时间睫状体光凝术后6个月,眼压分别从29.9±7.8显著降至21.1±6.5(p < 0.01)和从35.4±2.7降至24.1±3.4(p = 0.04),而仅长脉冲持续时间组的青光眼药物用量显著减少1.4±0.5(p = 0.02)。短脉冲持续时间睫状体光凝术后药物用量减少较少且未达到统计学显著性(0.9±0.9,p = 0.15)。视力恶化和并发症发生率无显著差异。
两种类型的睫状体光凝术在6个月时降低眼压的效果相同,但短脉冲持续时间方案使用较高激光功率,在3个月时能实现更大且更早的眼压降低。然而,长脉冲持续时间方案使用较低激光功率,在6个月时似乎在减少药物需求方面表现更好。