Choy Bonnie Nga Kwan, Lai Jimmy Shiu Ming, Yeung Jane Chun Chun, Chan Jonathan Cheuk Hung
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China,
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 7;12:2545-2552. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S188999. eCollection 2018.
This is a pilot study to compare the effectiveness and safety of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCP) with the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in the management of neovascular glaucoma (NVG).
Eyes with NVG and an IOP greater than 21 mmHg on maximal medications, without previous glaucoma surgery or cyclodestruction, were randomized for either TSCP or AGV implantation. These eyes were followed for at least 6 months and analyzed with respect to their visual outcome, IOP, number of glaucoma medications required, and related complications.
Twenty eyes (eight TSCP and 12 AGV) of 19 subjects with a follow-up duration of greater than 6 months were recruited. Mean follow-up duration was 28.5±17.9 and 31.0±15.4 months for the TSCP and AGV groups, respectively (=0.80). IOP was successfully controlled in 86% of the eyes for both interventions. By including preservation or improvement of visual acuity as additional criteria for overall success, success decreased to 63% for TSCP and 42% for AGV, although the difference was not statistically significant (=0.65). Eyes that had TSCP had fewer complications and required less subsequent procedures, compared to those that underwent AGV implantation.
Both procedures were equally effective in controlling the IOP and reducing glaucoma medications in NVG. However, eyes with AGV implant tended to have higher rates of visual loss and complications, as well as requiring more postoperative procedures, than eyes that were treated with TSCP, although the difference was not statistically significant.
本前瞻性研究旨在比较二极管激光经巩膜睫状体光凝术(TSCP)与艾哈迈德青光眼引流阀(AGV)治疗新生血管性青光眼(NVG)的有效性和安全性。
将最大药物治疗下眼压高于21 mmHg、未曾接受过青光眼手术或睫状体破坏术的NVG患者随机分为TSCP组或AGV植入组。对这些患者随访至少6个月,并分析其视力、眼压、所需青光眼药物数量及相关并发症。
招募了19例患者的20只眼(8只眼接受TSCP,12只眼接受AGV),随访时间均超过6个月。TSCP组和AGV组的平均随访时间分别为28.5±17.9个月和31.0±15.4个月(P=0.80)。两种干预措施均成功控制了86%的患眼眼压。若将视力保持或提高作为总体成功的额外标准,则TSCP组成功率降至63%,AGV组降至42%,尽管差异无统计学意义(P=0.65)。与接受AGV植入的患眼相比,接受TSCP治疗的患眼并发症更少,后续所需手术也更少。
两种手术在控制NVG眼压和减少青光眼药物使用方面同样有效。然而,尽管差异无统计学意义,但与接受TSCP治疗的患眼相比,植入AGV的患眼视力丧失和并发症发生率更高,术后所需手术更多。