Suppr超能文献

急诊科心力衰竭患者紧急心力衰竭死亡率风险分级风险模型的外部验证与优化

External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Sepehrvand Nariman, Youngson Erik, Bakal Jeffrey A, McAlister Finlay A, Rowe Brian H, Ezekowitz Justin A

机构信息

Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2019 Apr 12;1(3):123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003. eCollection 2019 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study using administrative data for all ambulance-transported patients from Alberta (2012-2016) presenting to the ED with a primary diagnosis of AHF.

RESULTS

Among 6708 patients with AHF, the 7-day mortality was 0.0%, 0.8%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 4.2%, and 12.0% across EHMRG risk categories (1-4, 5A and 5B). The EHMRG score had a c-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.76) for 7-day mortality and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for 30-day mortality, but lower c-statistics for other outcomes (0.61-0.67). The inclusion of natriuretic peptides to the EHMRG model improved prediction (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.173-0.363; 0.01) for 7-day mortality, as did the addition of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.005-0.218; 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The EHMRG model exhibited moderate discriminative ability in a large population-based cohort of patients with AHF in the ED. Revision of the EHMRG score through factor inclusion and exclusion could improve the model's performance.

摘要

背景

急诊心力衰竭死亡风险分级(EHMRG)用于评估急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者在急诊科(ED)就诊后7天内的死亡风险。我们旨在对因AHF就诊于ED的患者进行EHMRG模型的外部验证和优化。

方法

我们利用艾伯塔省(2012 - 2016年)所有经救护车转运至ED且初步诊断为AHF的患者的管理数据进行了一项队列研究。

结果

在6708例AHF患者中,按照EHMRG风险类别(1 - 4、5A和5B)划分,7天死亡率分别为0.0%、0.8%、1.6%、4.0%、4.2%和12.0%。EHMRG评分对7天死亡率的c指数为0.73(95%置信区间[CI],0.71 - 0.76),对30天死亡率的c指数为0.71(95%CI,0.70 - 0.73),但对其他结局的c统计量较低(0.61 - 0.67)。将利钠肽纳入EHMRG模型可改善对7天死亡率的预测(净重新分类改善,0.268;95%CI,0.173 - 0.363;P = 0.01),加入加拿大分诊及 acuity 量表后也是如此(净重新分类改善,0.111;95%CI,0.005 - 0.218;P = 0.04)。

结论

EHMRG模型在一个基于大量人群的ED中AHF患者队列中表现出中等的区分能力。通过纳入和排除因素对EHMRG评分进行修订可改善模型的性能。

相似文献

3
Improving the EHMRG Prognostic Evaluation of Acute Heart Failure with TAPSE/PASp: A Sequential Approach.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 13;12(2):478. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020478.
6
Retrospective validation of acute heart failure risk stratification in the emergency department.
Heart Lung. 2023 Jan-Feb;57:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
7
Performance of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade in the Emergency Department.
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 8;22(3):672-677. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.1.48978.
8
Acuity patterns of heart failure among emergency departments in a large health system.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.087. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
10
Emergency Heart failure Mortality Risk Grade may help to reduce heart failure admissions.
Neth Heart J. 2022 Sep;30(9):431-435. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01661-3. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Design and rationale for the Acute Congestive Heart Failure Urgent Care Evaluation: The ACUTE Study.
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 7.
4
The current and future financial burden of hospital admissions for heart failure in Canada: a cost analysis.
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jul 21;4(3):E365-E370. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150130. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
6
Factors Associated With Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Patients Presenting to Emergency Departments With Suspected Heart Failure.
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Aug;32(8):986.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
iChoose Kidney: A Clinical Decision Aid for Kidney Transplantation Versus Dialysis Treatment.
Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):630-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验