• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊心力衰竭死亡风险分级评分对急诊心力衰竭患者 7 天死亡率的预测性能:西班牙队列验证。

Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade score performance for 7-day mortality prediction in patients with heart failure attended at the emergency department: validation in a Spanish cohort.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital Clínic.

'Emergencies: Processes and Pathologies' Research Group.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):169-177. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000422.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000422
PMID:27622896
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) scale, derived in 86 Canadian emergency departments (EDs), stratifies patients with acute-decompensated heart failure (ADHF) according to their 7-day mortality risk. We evaluated its external validity in a Spanish cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We applied the EHMRG scale to ADHF patients consecutively included in the Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency departments (EAHFE) registry (29 Spanish EDs) and measured its performance. Patients were distributed into quintiles according to the original and their self-defined score cutoffs. The 7-day mortality rates were compared internally among different categories and with categories of Canadian cohorts.

RESULTS

The EAHFE group [n: 1553 patients; 80 (10) years; 55.6% women] had a 5.5% 7-day mortality rate and the EHMRG scale c-statistic was 0.741 (95% confidence interval: 0.688-0.793) compared with 0.807 (0.761-0.842) and 0.804 (0.763-0.840) obtained in the Canadian derivation and validation cohorts. The mortality rate of the EAHFE group mortality increased progressively as the quintile categories increased using intervals defined by either the Canadian or the Spanish EHMRG score cutoffs, although with more regular increments with the EAHFE-defined intervals; using the latter, patients at quintiles 2, 3, 4, 5a and 5b had (compared with quintile 1) odds ratios of 1.77, 3.36, 4.44, 9.39 and 16.19, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The EHMRG scale stratified risk in an ADHF cohort that included both palliative and nonpalliative patients in Spanish EDs, showing an extrapolation to a higher mortality risk cohort than the original derivation sample. Stratification improved when the score was recalibrated in the Spanish cohort.

摘要

目的

EHMRG 分级是在 86 家加拿大急诊部(ED)得出的,用于根据急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者的 7 天死亡率对其进行风险分层。我们在西班牙队列中评估了其外部有效性。

方法

我们将 EHMRG 分级应用于连续纳入的 ADHF 患者中,该研究来自西班牙 29 家 ED 的 EAHFE 注册研究,并对其进行了性能评估。根据原始分级和自定的分级截断值,患者被分为五分位数。比较了不同类别之间以及与加拿大队列类别之间的 7 天死亡率。

结果

EAHFE 组[患者 1553 例,年龄 80(10)岁,55.6%为女性]的 7 天死亡率为 5.5%,EHMRG 分级的 C 统计量为 0.741(95%置信区间:0.688-0.793),而在加拿大推导和验证队列中分别为 0.807(0.761-0.842)和 0.804(0.763-0.840)。使用加拿大或西班牙 EHMRG 分级截断值定义的间隔,随着五分位数类别增加,EAHFE 组的死亡率逐渐增加,尽管使用 EAHFE 定义的间隔时增加更为规则;使用后者,与五分位数 1 相比,五分位数 2、3、4、5a 和 5b 的患者的比值比分别为 1.77、3.36、4.44、9.39 和 16.19。

结论

EHMRG 分级对西班牙 ED 中同时包括姑息和非姑息患者的 ADHF 队列进行了风险分层,显示在比原始推导样本更高的死亡率风险队列中具有外推性。在西班牙队列中重新校准评分后,分层效果得到了改善。

相似文献

1
Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade score performance for 7-day mortality prediction in patients with heart failure attended at the emergency department: validation in a Spanish cohort.急诊心力衰竭死亡风险分级评分对急诊心力衰竭患者 7 天死亡率的预测性能:西班牙队列验证。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):169-177. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000422.
2
Predicting short-term mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure: The EAHFE-3D scale.预测慢性心力衰竭急性加重患者的短期死亡率:EAHFE-3D量表
Med Intensiva. 2016 Aug-Sep;40(6):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
The Usefulness of the MEESSI Score for Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Heart Failure at the Emergency Department.MEESSI评分在急诊科急性心力衰竭患者风险分层中的应用价值
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;72(3):198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
4
Patients with acute heart failure discharged from the emergency department and classified as low risk by the MEESSI score (multiple risk estimate based on the Spanish emergency department scale): prevalence of adverse events and predictability.MEESSI 评分(基于西班牙急诊室量表的多风险估计)评估为低风险的急性心力衰竭患者从急诊科出院:不良事件的发生率和可预测性。
Emergencias. 2019 Feb;31(1):5-14.
5
External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department.急诊科心力衰竭患者紧急心力衰竭死亡率风险分级风险模型的外部验证与优化
CJC Open. 2019 Apr 12;1(3):123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003. eCollection 2019 May.
6
Design and rationale for the Acute Congestive Heart Failure Urgent Care Evaluation: The ACUTE Study.急性充血性心力衰竭紧急护理评估的设计与原理:ACUTE研究
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 7.
7
Effects on short term outcome of non-invasive ventilation use in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure: A propensity score-based analysis of the EAHFE Registry.无创通气在急诊科治疗急性心力衰竭患者对短期结局的影响:EAHFE 登记研究的倾向评分分析。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Jul;53:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
External validity of a prognostic score for acute heart failure based on the Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments registry: the EAHFE-3D scale.基于急诊急性心力衰竭的流行病学注册研究的急性心力衰竭预后评分的外部有效性:EAHFE-3D 量表。
Emergencias. 2018;30(2):84-90.
9
Predicting 30-Day Mortality for Patients With Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: A Cohort Study.预测急诊科急性心力衰竭患者 30 天死亡率:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 21;167(10):698-705. doi: 10.7326/M16-2726. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Retrospective validation of acute heart failure risk stratification in the emergency department.回顾性验证急诊科急性心力衰竭风险分层。
Heart Lung. 2023 Jan-Feb;57:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of the EHMRG score in patients with decompensated heart failure in the emergency department.EHMRG评分在急诊科失代偿性心力衰竭患者中的作用。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e44027. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044027.
2
Barriers and facilitators to use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure presentations in the emergency department: a qualitative study.急诊科急性心力衰竭患者使用HEARTRISK6量表的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
CJEM. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8.
3
Initial Care Pathway in Acute Heart Failure From Home to Hospital.
急性心力衰竭从家庭到医院的初始护理路径
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):e70161. doi: 10.1002/clc.70161.
4
The HEARTRISK6 Scale: Predicting Short-Term Serious Outcomes in Emergency Department Acute Heart Failure Patients.心脏风险6评分量表:预测急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的短期严重结局
JACC Adv. 2024 May 24;3(7):100988. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100988. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Outcomes of acute heart failure patients managed in the emergency department.急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的治疗结果。
CJEM. 2023 Sep;25(9):752-760. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00555-6. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Evaluation of the HEFESTOS scale to predict outcomes in emergency department acute heart failure patients.评估 HEFESTOS 量表在急诊科急性心力衰竭患者预后预测中的应用。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;17(7):2129-2140. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03068-9. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
7
Implementation of EHMRG Risk Model in an Italian Population of Elderly Patients with Acute Heart Failure.EHMRG风险模型在意大利老年急性心力衰竭患者群体中的应用
J Clin Med. 2022 May 25;11(11):2982. doi: 10.3390/jcm11112982.
8
Emergency Heart failure Mortality Risk Grade may help to reduce heart failure admissions.急性心力衰竭死亡风险分级可能有助于减少心力衰竭住院人数。
Neth Heart J. 2022 Sep;30(9):431-435. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01661-3. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Improving the EHMRG Prognostic Evaluation of Acute Heart Failure with TAPSE/PASp: A Sequential Approach.利用三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移/肺动脉加速时间改善急性心力衰竭的欧洲心力衰竭注册研究预后评估:一种序贯方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 13;12(2):478. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020478.
10
The emergency department arrival mode and its relations to ED management and 30-day mortality in acute heart failure: an ancillary analysis from the EURODEM study.急诊科到达模式及其与急性心力衰竭的 ED 管理和 30 天死亡率的关系:来自 EURODEM 研究的辅助分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00574-z.