Chaudhari Nileshkumar, Godoy-Santos Alexandre Leme, Netto Cesar de Cesar, Rodriguez Ramon, Dun Shouchen, He Jun Kit, McKissack Haley, Fleisig Glenn S, Pires Eduardo Araujo, Shah Ashish
University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , United States .
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo , SP , Brazil .
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Mar 6;18:e0AO5052. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5052. eCollection 2020.
To compare screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis.
Eight matched pairs of cadaver feet underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis with two 7.3mm cannulated screws. Randomization was used to assign screw orientation, such that one foot in each pair was assigned dorsal to plantar screw orientation (DP Group), and the other foot, plantar to dorsal orientation (PD Group). Standard surgical technique with fluoroscopy was used for each approach. Following fixation, each specimen was loaded to failure with a Bionix ® 858 MTS device, applying a downward axial force at a distance to create torque. Torque to failure was compared between DP and PD Groups using Student's t test, with p=0.05 used to determine statistical significance.
Statistical analysis demonstrated that the mean torque to failure slightly favored the DP Group (37.3Nm) to the PD Group (32.2Nm). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.55).
In subtalar arthrodesis, there is no significant difference in construct strength between dorsal-to-plantar and plantar-to-dorsal screw orientation. The approach chosen by the surgeon should be based on factors other than the biomechanical strength of the screw orientation.
比较距下关节融合术的螺钉固定强度。
八对匹配的尸体足采用两枚7.3毫米空心螺钉进行距下关节融合术。采用随机分组确定螺钉方向,每对足部中一只采用背侧到跖侧的螺钉方向(DP组),另一只采用跖侧到背侧的方向(PD组)。每种方法均采用标准手术技术并在透视引导下进行。固定后,使用Bionix® 858 MTS装置对每个标本施加轴向力直至破坏,在一定距离处施加向下的轴向力以产生扭矩。使用Student t检验比较DP组和PD组的破坏扭矩,以p = 0.05确定统计学显著性。
统计分析表明,破坏扭矩的平均值略倾向于DP组(37.3牛米)而非PD组(32.2牛米)。然而,两组之间的差异无统计学显著性(p = 0.55)。
在距下关节融合术中,背侧到跖侧与跖侧到背侧的螺钉方向在结构强度上无显著差异。外科医生选择的方法应基于螺钉方向生物力学强度以外的因素。