Suppr超能文献

模拟战对急诊医学住院医师整体评分量表及在职培训考试成绩的影响。

The Effect of Simulation Wars on EM Residents' Global Rating Scales and In-Training Examination Scores.

作者信息

Mendez Donna, Takenaka Katrin, Cardenas-Turanzas Marylou, Suarez Guillermo

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center/McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 27;12:35-42. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S223257. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) restricted the duty hours for residents training in 2004. With less time to learn medicine, residents may not develop the clinical reasoning skills needed. Simulation can provide a remedy for this lack of time by allowing residents to practice skills and develop clinical reasoning in a simulated environment. Simulation Wars (SimWars), a clinical reasoning simulation has been shown to improve clinical reasoning skills. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of Simulation Wars on In-Training Examination (ITE) Scores and Global Rating Scale (GRS) Scores in Emergency Medicine (EM) residents.

METHODS

The Quasi-Experimental design was used in this retrospective study. The main comparison was between historical controls, the residents who did not participate in the Simulation Wars, and the intervention group comprised of residents who participated in the SimWars.

RESULTS

A total of 127 residents were participants in this study including 70 from the intervention and 57 from the historical control group. There were no significant differences found in GRS scores between both groups except for Communication and Professionalism (p<0.001). No overall improvement in ITE scores for the control group and for the intervention group was found. Furthermore, within the intervention group, while comparing those residents who participated in certain subcategories of SimWars and those who did not, there was a significant improvement in ITE scores in the subcategories of Thoracic Disorders, Abdominal/Gastrointestinal, Trauma Disorders and OBGyn.

CONCLUSION

SimWars in the subcategories of Abdominal/Gastrointestinal, Thoracic, OBGyn and Trauma were found to be associated with improved ITE scores in those subcategories. Since Emergency Medicine utilizes extensive clinical reasoning skills, SimWars may provide better educational opportunities for EM residents.

摘要

目的

毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)于2004年对住院医师培训的值班时长进行了限制。由于学习医学的时间减少,住院医师可能无法培养所需的临床推理技能。模拟可以通过让住院医师在模拟环境中练习技能和培养临床推理能力来弥补时间的不足。模拟战(SimWars)是一种临床推理模拟,已被证明可以提高临床推理技能。本研究的目的是调查模拟战对急诊医学(EM)住院医师的在职考试(ITE)成绩和整体评分量表(GRS)成绩的影响。

方法

本回顾性研究采用准实验设计。主要比较对象是历史对照组(未参加模拟战的住院医师)和由参加模拟战的住院医师组成的干预组。

结果

本研究共有127名住院医师参与,其中干预组70名,历史对照组57名。除沟通和职业素养外,两组的GRS评分无显著差异(p<0.001)。未发现对照组和干预组的ITE成绩有整体提高。此外,在干预组中,比较参加模拟战某些子类别的住院医师和未参加的住院医师,发现胸部疾病、腹部/胃肠道、创伤疾病和妇产科等子类别的ITE成绩有显著提高。

结论

发现腹部/胃肠道、胸部、妇产科和创伤等子类别的模拟战与这些子类别中ITE成绩的提高有关。由于急诊医学需要广泛的临床推理技能,模拟战可能为急诊医学住院医师提供更好的教育机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab1/7051803/d9c8a8a0478f/OAEM-12-35-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Simulation Wars on EM Residents' Global Rating Scales and In-Training Examination Scores.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 27;12:35-42. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S223257. eCollection 2020.
2
Simulation for Assessment of Milestones in Emergency Medicine Residents.
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):205-220. doi: 10.1111/acem.13296. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
4
Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents' Clinical Reasoning: Validation of a Script Concordance Test.
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 24;21(4):978-984. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46035.
7
Evaluation of Progress of an ACGME-International Accredited Residency Program in Qatar.
Qatar Med J. 2020 Apr 10;2020(1):6. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.6. eCollection 2020.
8
Filling the Gap: Simulation-based Crisis Resource Management Training for Emergency Medicine Residents.
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):205-210. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.35284. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
SimWars.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;47(5):586-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.058. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
10
Does the Emergency Medicine In-training Examination Accurately Reflect Residents' Clinical Experiences?
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Sep 19;3(4):317-322. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10381. eCollection 2019 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Pediatric Residency Training Through Peer-Education Based Gamified Simulation.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Sep 3;16:1621-1626. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S518814. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of fellowship-trained medical toxicology faculty on emergency medicine resident in-training examination scores.
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jan 24;7(1):e10840. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10840. eCollection 2023 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2016 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine.
J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):846-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.040. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
2
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
3
Dual processing theory and experts' reasoning: exploring thinking on national multiple-choice questions.
Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Aug;4(4):168-175. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0196-6.
5
Emergency medicine resident crisis resource management ability: a simulation-based longitudinal study.
Med Educ Online. 2014 Dec 9;19:25771. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25771. eCollection 2014.
6
SimWars.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;47(5):586-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.058. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
7
From mindless to mindful practice--cognitive bias and clinical decision making.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 27;368(26):2445-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1303712.
8
An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):954-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01900.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验