Prempeh Agya B A, Duys Rowan, de Vaal Alma, Parker Romy
Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Health SA. 2020 Jan 20;25:1281. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1281. eCollection 2020.
In spite of advances in techniques and analgesics for pain management, pain remains a major health problem. Regular assessment and reassessment of pain using guidelines with measurable goals is essential for effective pain management in surgical wards. Unfortunately, no such guidelines exist in South Africa. To implement appropriate precepts for the South African context, the current practice must be understood.
The aim of this article was to evaluate pain assessment and management of patients in two surgical wards at a tertiary hospital in South Africa.
The study was conducted within the Western Cape Province of South Africa in a government-funded tertiary academic institution. The patients at this hospital are generally from the low-income strata and live in resource-poor communities.
A cross-sectional, retrospective medical record audit was conducted. The folders of all 215 patients admitted to a specific orthopaedic trauma and urogynaecological ward of a tertiary hospital in South Africa over a span of 1 month were targeted for review. Medical folders that were not available or had missing notes were excluded. Variables evaluated included the number of pain assessments recorded, pain assessor, assessment tool and management plan.
A total of 168 folders were available for review. Nearly half of the patients had no documented pain assessment. The Verbal Rating Scale was the predominant tool used, and assessments were mostly conducted by the ward doctor. Pain interventions appeared to be primarily based on the professional knowledge of the practitioner and were not evidence-based.
Pain assessment and management was a problem in the two wards reviewed, which is similar to the findings from studies referenced in this text. Health professionals must be empowered to manage pain adequately. An assessment tool that integrates the biopsychosocial factors that influence the pain experience should be routinely employed by a multidisciplinary team to facilitate goal-directed therapy.
尽管在疼痛管理的技术和镇痛药物方面取得了进展,但疼痛仍然是一个主要的健康问题。在外科病房,使用具有可衡量目标的指南定期评估和重新评估疼痛对于有效的疼痛管理至关重要。不幸的是,南非不存在这样的指南。为了在南非背景下实施适当的规范,必须了解当前的做法。
本文的目的是评估南非一家三级医院两个外科病房患者的疼痛评估和管理情况。
该研究在南非西开普省的一家政府资助的三级学术机构内进行。这家医院的患者通常来自低收入阶层,生活在资源匮乏的社区。
进行了一项横断面回顾性病历审计。对南非一家三级医院特定骨科创伤和泌尿妇科病房在1个月内收治的所有215例患者的病历进行审查。无法获取或有缺失记录的病历被排除。评估的变量包括记录的疼痛评估次数、疼痛评估者、评估工具和管理计划。
共有168份病历可供审查。近一半的患者没有记录在案的疼痛评估。言语评定量表是主要使用的工具,评估大多由病房医生进行。疼痛干预似乎主要基于从业者的专业知识,而非循证依据。
在所审查的两个病房中,疼痛评估和管理存在问题,这与本文引用的研究结果相似。必须赋予卫生专业人员充分管理疼痛的权力。一个多学科团队应常规使用一种整合影响疼痛体验的生物心理社会因素的评估工具,以促进目标导向治疗。