Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Br J Surg. 2020 May;107(6):662-668. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11441. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
The effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention depends on low procedural risks. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and timing of procedural complications after CEA, which may clarify underlying mechanisms and help inform safe discharge policies.
Individual-patient data were obtained from four large carotid intervention trials (VACS, ACAS, ACST-1 and GALA; 1983-2007). Patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis directly after randomization were used for the present analysis. Timing of procedural death and stroke was divided into intraoperative day 0, postoperative day 0, days 1-3 and days 4-30.
Some 3694 patients were included in the analysis. A total of 103 patients (2·8 per cent) had serious procedural complications (18 fatal strokes, 68 non-fatal strokes, 11 fatal myocardial infarctions and 6 deaths from other causes) [Correction added on 20 April, after first online publication: the percentage value has been corrected to 2·8]. Of the 86 strokes, 67 (78 per cent) were ipsilateral, 17 (20 per cent) were contralateral and two (2 per cent) were vertebrobasilar. Forty-five strokes (52 per cent) were ischaemic, nine (10 per cent) haemorrhagic, and stroke subtype was not determined in 32 patients (37 per cent). Half of the strokes happened on the day of CEA. Of all serious complications recorded, 44 (42·7 per cent) occurred on day 0 (20 intraoperative, 17 postoperative, 7 with unclear timing), 23 (22·3 per cent) on days 1-3 and 36 (35·0 per cent) on days 4-30.
At least half of the procedural strokes in this study were ischaemic and ipsilateral to the treated artery. Half of all procedural complications occurred on the day of surgery, but one-third after day 3 when many patients had been discharged.
颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)预防中风的有效性取决于低程序风险。本研究旨在评估 CEA 后程序并发症的频率和时间,这可能阐明潜在机制并有助于制定安全出院政策。
从四项大型颈动脉介入试验(VACS、ACAS、ACST-1 和 GALA;1983-2007 年)中获得个体患者数据。本分析使用随机分组后直接接受 CEA 的无症状颈动脉狭窄患者。程序死亡和中风的时间分为手术当天 0 天、手术后第 0 天、第 1-3 天和第 4-30 天。
共有 3694 名患者纳入分析。共有 103 名患者(2.8%)发生严重程序并发症(18 例致命性中风、68 例非致命性中风、11 例致命性心肌梗死和 6 例其他原因死亡)[2023 年 4 月 20 日更正后添加:百分比值已更正为 2.8%]。在 86 例中风中,67 例(78%)为同侧,17 例(20%)为对侧,2 例(2%)为椎基底动脉。45 例(52%)为缺血性,9 例(10%)为出血性,32 例(37%)未确定中风亚型。一半的中风发生在 CEA 当天。所有记录的严重并发症中,44 例(42.7%)发生在第 0 天(20 例手术中,17 例手术后,7 例时间不明),23 例(22.3%)发生在第 1-3 天,36 例(35.0%)发生在第 4-30 天。
本研究中至少一半的程序中风为同侧缺血性。一半的程序并发症发生在手术当天,但三分之一发生在第 3 天以后,当时许多患者已经出院。