University of California San Diego (C.L.C., H.D.-A., K.S.Y., M.B.M.).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.J.L., M.L.S.).
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):100-107. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032410. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
Advancements in carotid revascularization have produced promising outcomes in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, the optimal timing of revascularization procedures after symptomatic presentation remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare in-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), transfemoral carotid stenting (TFCAS), or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed within different time intervals after most recent symptoms.
This is a retrospective cohort study of United States patients in the vascular quality initiative. All carotid revascularizations performed for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between September 2016 and November 2019 were included. Procedures were categorized as urgent (0-2 days after most recent symptom), early (3-14 days), or late (15-180 days). The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital stroke and death. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital stroke, death, and transient ischemic attacks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes.
A total of 18 643 revascularizations were included: 2006 (10.8%) urgent, 7423 (39.8%) early, and 9214 (49.42%) late. Patients with TFCAS had the highest rates of stroke/death at all timing cohorts (urgent: 4.0% CEA, 6.9% TFCAS, 6.5% TCAR, =0.018; early: 2.5% CEA, 3.8% TFCAS, 2.9% TCAR, =0.054; late: 1.6% CEA, 2.8% TFCAS, 2.3% TCAR, =0.003). TFCAS also had increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death compared with CEA in all 3 groups (urgent adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0-2.9] =0.03; early aOR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.4] =0.01; and late aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-3.0] =0.01). TCAR and CEA had comparable odds of in-hospital stroke/death in all 3 groups (urgent aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 0.9-4], =0.10), (early aOR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.7-1.7], =0.66), (late aOR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.9-2.3], =0.08).
CEA remains the safest method of revascularization within the urgent period. Among revascularization performed outside of the 48 hours, TCAR and CEA have comparable outcomes.
颈动脉血运重建的进步为有症状颈动脉狭窄患者带来了有前景的结果。然而,症状出现后行血运重建的最佳时机仍不清楚。本研究的目的是比较在最近症状后不同时间间隔内进行的经颈动脉血运重建(TCAR)、经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(TFCAS)或颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的住院期间结局。
这是美国血管质量倡议中的一项回顾性队列研究。纳入了 2016 年 9 月至 2019 年 11 月期间因有症状颈动脉狭窄而行的所有颈动脉血运重建手术。手术分为紧急(最近症状后 0-2 天)、早期(3-14 天)或晚期(15-180 天)。主要研究结局为住院期间卒中及死亡。次要结局包括住院期间卒中、死亡和短暂性脑缺血发作。采用多变量逻辑回归比较结局。
共纳入 18643 例血运重建术:2006 例(10.8%)为紧急,7423 例(39.8%)为早期,9214 例(49.42%)为晚期。TFCAS 组在所有时间队列中卒中/死亡率最高(紧急:CEA 为 4.0%,TFCAS 为 6.9%,TCAR 为 6.5%,=0.018;早期:CEA 为 2.5%,TFCAS 为 3.8%,TCAR 为 2.9%,=0.054;晚期:CEA 为 1.6%,TFCAS 为 2.8%,TCAR 为 2.3%,=0.003)。在所有 3 组中,TFCAS 与 CEA 相比,住院期间卒中/死亡的比值比均升高(紧急:调整比值比[aOR],1.7[95%CI,1.0-2.9],=0.03;早期:aOR,1.6[95%CI,1.1-2.4],=0.01;晚期:aOR,1.9[95%CI,1.2-3.0],=0.01)。在所有 3 组中,TCAR 和 CEA 住院期间卒中/死亡的比值比相似(紧急:aOR,1.9[95%CI,0.9-4],=0.10),(早期:aOR,1.1[95%CI,0.7-1.7],=0.66),(晚期:aOR,1.5[95%CI,0.9-2.3],=0.08)。
CEA 仍然是最安全的紧急血运重建方法。在 48 小时以外进行的血运重建中,TCAR 和 CEA 的结局相似。