Stapleton Peta, Crighton Gabrielle, Sabot Debbie, O'Neill Hayley Maree
School of Psychology, Bond University.
Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University.
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Nov;12(8):869-877. doi: 10.1037/tra0000563. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
In a direct replication of Church, Yount, and Brooks (2012), this study examined changes in stress biochemistry and psychological distress symptoms in 53 participants randomly allocated to one of three 60-min group interventions: Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT), psychoeducation (PE), and no treatment (NT). The Symptom Assessment-45 (SA-45) was used to assess psychological distress symptoms.
Salivary cortisol assays were administered 30 min pre- and postintervention to test cortisol levels. The original study by Church et al. indicated the EFT group showed statistically significant improvements in anxiety (-58.34%, p < .05), depression (-49.33%, p < .002), overall severity of symptoms (-50.5%, p < .001), and symptom breadth (-41.93%, p < .001). The group also experienced a significant decrease in cortisol (-24.39%) compared to the PE group (-14.25%) and NT group (-14.44%).
The present results indicated the EFT group experienced a significant decrease in cortisol greater than the original study (-43.24%, p < .05), but these results were not mirrored by subjective reports of psychological distress. The EFT group reduction in cortisol was significantly different from that of the PE group (-19.67%), and as expected, the posttreatment cortisol level detected among the EFT group was lower than that of the NT group (2.02%); however, there was not a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Additionally, there were no significant improvements in cortisol reduction among the NT and PE groups.
Findings support the original study indicating EFT to be an efficient and effective brief treatment for reducing biological markers of stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
在对丘奇、扬特和布鲁克斯(2012年)研究的直接复制中,本研究调查了53名参与者的应激生物化学变化和心理困扰症状,这些参与者被随机分配到三种60分钟的团体干预之一:情绪自由技术(EFT)、心理教育(PE)和无治疗(NT)。使用症状评估-45(SA-45)来评估心理困扰症状。
在干预前后30分钟进行唾液皮质醇检测以测试皮质醇水平。丘奇等人的原始研究表明,EFT组在焦虑(-58.34%,p < .05)、抑郁(-49.33%,p < .002)、症状总体严重程度(-50.5%,p < .001)和症状广度(-41.93%,p < .001)方面有统计学上的显著改善。与PE组(-14.25%)和NT组(-14.44%)相比,该组的皮质醇也显著下降(-24.39%)。
目前的结果表明,EFT组的皮质醇显著下降幅度大于原始研究(-43.24%,p < .05),但心理困扰的主观报告并未反映这些结果。EFT组皮质醇的下降与PE组(-19.67%)有显著差异,正如预期的那样,EFT组治疗后的皮质醇水平低于NT组(2.02%);然而,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,NT组和PE组在皮质醇降低方面没有显著改善。
研究结果支持原始研究,表明EFT是一种有效且高效的短期治疗方法,可减少应激的生物学指标。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020美国心理学会,保留所有权利)