• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最大化多层社交网络上的多重影响和公平种子分配。

Maximizing multiple influences and fair seed allocation on multilayer social networks.

机构信息

School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou, Fujian province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229201. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229201
PMID:32163423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7067483/
Abstract

The dissemination of information on networks involves many important practical issues, such as the spread and containment of rumors in social networks, the spread of infectious diseases among the population, commercial propaganda and promotion, the expansion of political influence and so on. One of the most important problems is the influence-maximization problem which is to find out k most influential nodes under a certain propagate mechanism. Since the problem was proposed in 2001, many works have focused on maximizing the influence in a single network. It is a NP-hard problem and the state-of-art algorithm IMM proposed by Youze Tang et al. achieves a ratio of 63.2% of the optimum with nearly linear time complexity. In recent years, there have been some works of maximizing influence on multilayer networks, either in the situation of single or multiple influences. But most of them study seed selection strategies to maximize their own influence from the perspective of participants. In fact, the problem from the perspective of network owners is also worthy of attention. Since network participants have not had access to all information of the network for reasons such as privacy protection and corporate interests, they may have access to only part of the social network. The owners of networks can get the whole picture of the networks, and they need not only to maximize the overall influence, but also to consider allocating seeds to their customers fairly, i.e., the Fair Seed Allocation (FSA) problem. As far as we know, FSA problem has been studied on a single network, but not on multilayer networks yet. From the perspective of network owners, we propose a multiple-influence diffusion model MMIC on multilayer networks and its FSA problem. Two solutions of FSA problem are given in this paper, and we prove theoretically that our seed allocation schemes are greedy. Subsequent experiments also validate the effectiveness of our approaches.

摘要

网络信息的传播涉及到许多重要的实际问题,例如社交网络中的谣言传播和遏制、人群中的传染病传播、商业宣传和推广、政治影响力的扩大等。其中最重要的问题之一是影响最大化问题,即在给定传播机制下找出 k 个最具影响力的节点。自 2001 年提出该问题以来,许多工作都集中在最大化单个网络中的影响力。这是一个 NP 难问题,Youze Tang 等人提出的最先进算法 IMM 以近乎线性的时间复杂度实现了最优解的 63.2%的比例。近年来,已有一些关于多层网络上的最大影响力的工作,无论是在单影响还是多影响的情况下。但大多数都是从参与者的角度研究种子选择策略来最大化自身的影响力。事实上,从网络所有者的角度来看,这个问题也值得关注。由于隐私保护和企业利益等原因,网络参与者无法获得网络的所有信息,他们可能只能访问部分社交网络。网络所有者可以获得网络的全貌,他们不仅需要最大化整体影响力,还需要公平地为其客户分配种子,即公平种子分配(FSA)问题。据我们所知,FSA 问题已经在单网络上进行了研究,但尚未在多层网络上进行研究。从网络所有者的角度出发,我们在多层网络上提出了一个多影响扩散模型 MMIC 及其 FSA 问题。本文给出了 FSA 问题的两种解决方案,并从理论上证明了我们的种子分配方案是贪婪的。随后的实验也验证了我们方法的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/c48e722b9dcd/pone.0229201.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/3a9cf1d58c1b/pone.0229201.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/113f69dadefe/pone.0229201.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/894fcb6b8f28/pone.0229201.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/1ffd9c02a2ae/pone.0229201.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/8318972dd847/pone.0229201.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/025624ab0963/pone.0229201.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/dcd221ced51b/pone.0229201.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/a587bd5ea49f/pone.0229201.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/f8868883b86f/pone.0229201.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/bd437f3f173f/pone.0229201.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/c48e722b9dcd/pone.0229201.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/3a9cf1d58c1b/pone.0229201.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/113f69dadefe/pone.0229201.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/894fcb6b8f28/pone.0229201.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/1ffd9c02a2ae/pone.0229201.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/8318972dd847/pone.0229201.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/025624ab0963/pone.0229201.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/dcd221ced51b/pone.0229201.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/a587bd5ea49f/pone.0229201.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/f8868883b86f/pone.0229201.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/bd437f3f173f/pone.0229201.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4d2/7067483/c48e722b9dcd/pone.0229201.g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Maximizing multiple influences and fair seed allocation on multilayer social networks.最大化多层社交网络上的多重影响和公平种子分配。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229201. eCollection 2020.
2
MATI: An efficient algorithm for influence maximization in social networks.MATI:一种用于社交网络中影响最大化的有效算法。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206318. eCollection 2018.
3
Identifying Influential Nodes Using a Shell-Based Ranking and Filtering Method in Social Networks.基于外壳的排名和过滤方法在社交网络中识别有影响力的节点。
Big Data. 2021 Jun;9(3):219-232. doi: 10.1089/big.2020.0259. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
TSSCM: A synergism-based three-step cascade model for influence maximization on large-scale social networks.TSSCM:一种基于协同作用的三步级联模型,用于在大规模社交网络上进行影响力最大化。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 3;14(9):e0221271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221271. eCollection 2019.
5
Social influence maximization under empirical influence models.实证影响模型下的社会影响力最大化。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):375-382. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0346-z. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Community-based rumor blocking maximization in social networks: Algorithms and analysis.社交网络中基于社区的谣言阻断最大化:算法与分析
Theor Comput Sci. 2020 Nov 6;840:257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Polarity related influence maximization in signed social networks.带符号社交网络中与极性相关的影响力最大化
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 25;9(7):e102199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102199. eCollection 2014.
8
Diversified-profit maximization in competitive social advertising.竞争型社会广告中的多元化利润最大化
J Comb Optim. 2023;45(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s10878-022-00967-7. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
Balanced influence maximization in social networks based on deep reinforcement learning.基于深度强化学习的社交网络中的均衡影响力最大化。
Neural Netw. 2024 Jan;169:334-351. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.10.030. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
10
Learning from Bees: An Approach for Influence Maximization on Viral Campaigns.向蜜蜂学习:一种在病毒式传播活动中实现影响力最大化的方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 19;11(12):e0168125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168125. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Interaction between official institutions and influential users of rumor control in online social networks.官方机构与在线社交网络中谣言控制有影响力用户之间的互动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 2;13:937296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937296. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Interacting opinion and disease dynamics in multiplex networks: Discontinuous phase transition and nonmonotonic consensus times.多重网络中的交互意见和疾病动态:不连续相变和非单调共识时间。
Phys Rev E. 2017 May;95(5-1):052315. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052315. Epub 2017 May 22.
2
Collective Phenomena Emerging from the Interactions between Dynamical Processes in Multiplex Networks.多重网络中动态过程相互作用产生的集体现象。
Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Mar 31;118(13):138302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.138302.
3
SNAP: A General Purpose Network Analysis and Graph Mining Library.
SNAP:一个通用的网络分析和图挖掘库。
ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2016 Oct;8(1). doi: 10.1145/2898361. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
4
Community Size Effects on Epidemic Spreading in Multiplex Social Networks.社区规模对多重社交网络中流行病传播的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0152021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152021. eCollection 2016.
5
Two-stage effects of awareness cascade on epidemic spreading in multiplex networks.意识级联对多重网络中流行病传播的两阶段效应。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Jan;91(1):012822. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012822. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
6
Competing spreading processes on multiplex networks: awareness and epidemics.多重网络上的竞争传播过程:认知与流行病
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Jul;90(1):012808. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012808. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
7
Multiplexity-facilitated cascades in networks.网络中多重性促进的级联反应。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Apr;85(4 Pt 2):045102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.045102. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Modeling the dynamical interaction between epidemics on overlay networks.模拟覆盖网络上流行病之间的动态相互作用。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Aug;84(2 Pt 2):026105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.026105. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
9
Interacting epidemics on overlay networks.覆盖网络上的相互作用流行病。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Mar;81(3 Pt 2):036118. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036118. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
10
Networks of influence and infection: parental choices and childhood disease.影响与感染网络:父母的选择与儿童疾病
J R Soc Interface. 2009 Sep 6;6(38):811-4. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0085. Epub 2009 May 15.