Davies Geoff, Hayward Mark, Evans Simon, Mason Oliver
Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK; Surrey & Borders NHS Trust, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, UK; Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Apr;286:112864. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112864. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Existing models of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) suggest that a combination of genetic vulnerability, childhood trauma, and disrupted attachment can lead to the marked emotional lability, impulsivity and interpersonal difficulties observed clinically. Brain structural differences in frontal, limbic and hippocampal regions have been reported in BPD. Less clear is how specific psychological factors relate to these structural differences, and how consistently this is found across studies. This was the focus of the present review. Eighteen studies published between 2004 and 2018 met inclusion criteria encompassing 990 participants. Study quality was assessed using the Nottingham-Ottawa Scale. We also introduce a newly devised scale to assess MRI reporting quality. The most frequently investigated psychological variable were impulsivity (9 studies), depression (8), trauma (6), aggression (6), severity of symptoms (3), global functioning, abuse and dissociation (2). Study quality varied, however, a trend was observed where newer studies were higher in reporting quality. Impulsivity demonstrated greater association with frontal structures, trauma related to the hypothalamus and limbic systems, and aggression with hippocampal and frontal structures. The present review recommends greater exploration of neurocognitive and psychosis-related features such as delusions, paranoia and voice-hearing in future studies, and to investigate cortical changes in longitudinal designs.
现有的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)模型表明,遗传易感性、童年创伤和依恋关系紊乱共同作用,可能导致临床上观察到的明显情绪不稳定、冲动性和人际困难。已有报道称,BPD患者在额叶、边缘叶和海马体区域存在脑结构差异。目前尚不清楚特定心理因素与这些结构差异之间的关系,以及不同研究中这种关系的一致性如何。这是本综述的重点。2004年至2018年间发表的18项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入990名参与者。使用诺丁汉-渥太华量表评估研究质量。我们还引入了一个新设计的量表来评估MRI报告质量。研究最多的心理变量是冲动性(9项研究)、抑郁(8项)、创伤(6项)、攻击性(6项)、症状严重程度(3项)、整体功能、虐待和解离(2项)。研究质量各不相同,然而,观察到一种趋势,即较新的研究报告质量更高。冲动性与额叶结构的关联更强,创伤与下丘脑和边缘系统相关,攻击性与海马体和额叶结构相关。本综述建议在未来研究中更深入地探索神经认知和精神病相关特征,如妄想、偏执和幻听,并在纵向研究中调查皮质变化。