Department of Ophthalmology, Christus University Center (Unichristus), Fortaleza, Brazil,
Department of Ophthalmology, Christus University Center (Unichristus), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(1):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000507120. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Scleral and iris fixation of intraocular lenses (IOL) are useful in the treatment of surgical or traumatic aphakia, luxation, and subluxation of IOL if the patient does not present appropriate capsular support. However, there is no consensus in the literature about which of these 2 methods is safer and better. The authors performed a literature review searching the main postoperative outcomes obtained with the use of each surgical method. Scleral and iris fixation of IOL are efficient in correction of the patients' visual acuity, even though each technique presents distinct complications which depend especially on the experience of the surgeon with the performed surgical method. It is important to understand that individuals submitted to scleral or iris fixation present previous preoperative complications in their eyes. Besides, both procedures are very complex, involving intense manipulation of the eye globe. The success rate of these surgical techniques is highly variable and has a close relation to the preoperative conditions of the patient's eye and the improvement of the surgeon's learning curve.
巩膜和虹膜固定眼内透镜(IOL)在治疗手术或创伤性无晶状体症、IOL 脱位和半脱位方面很有用,如果患者没有适当的囊袋支持。然而,文献中对于这两种方法哪一种更安全、更好还没有共识。作者进行了文献回顾,搜索了每种手术方法获得的主要术后结果。巩膜和虹膜固定 IOL 在矫正患者视力方面非常有效,尽管每种技术都有不同的并发症,这些并发症特别取决于医生对所进行手术方法的经验。重要的是要了解,接受巩膜或虹膜固定的患者其眼部先前有术前并发症。此外,这两种手术都非常复杂,涉及眼球的强烈操作。这些手术技术的成功率差异很大,与患者眼部的术前情况以及医生学习曲线的提高密切相关。