BMT and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jun;26(6):1099-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Disease relapse is the most common cause of therapy failure in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). It is not known whether or not increasing total body irradiation (TBI) dose from 2 to 4 Gy in a RIC platform can provide improved disease control without increasing nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we evaluated the outcomes of patients with NHL receiving RIC allo-HCT with either fludarabine (Flu)/2-Gy TBI versus Flu/4-Gy TBI. In the CIBMTR registry, 413 adult patients with NHL underwent a first allo-HCT using either a matched related or unrelated donor between 2008 and 2017, using a RIC regimen with either Flu/2-Gy TBI (n = 349) or Flu/4-Gy TBI (n = 64). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), NRM, relapse/progression, and progression-free survival (PFS). At baseline, the Flu/2-Gy TBI cohort had significantly fewer patients with Karnofsky performance status ≥90 and significantly more patients had a higher HCT-comorbidity index. On multivariate analysis, the 2 conditioning cohorts were not significantly different in terms of risk of grade 3 to 4 aGVHD or cGVHD. Compared to Flu/2-Gy TBI, the Flu/4-Gy TBI conditioning was associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 2.89; P = .02) and inferior OS (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.23, P = .03). No significant differences were seen in the risk of relapse/progression (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.29, P = .33) or PFS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.54, P = .61) between the 2 regimens. Comparing Flu/2-Gy TBI versus Flu/4-Gy TBI cohorts, the 5-year adjusted outcomes were NRM (28% versus 47%; P = .005), relapse/progression (35% versus 29%; P = .28), PFS (37% versus 24%; P = .03), and OS (51% versus 31%; P = .001), respectively. Relapse was the most common cause of death in both cohorts. In patients with NHL undergoing Flu/TB I-based conditioning, augmenting TBI dose from 2 to 4 Gy is associated with higher NRM and inferior OS, without any significant benefit in terms of disease control. The optimal dose is 2-Gy in the RIC Flu/TBI platform for lymphomas.
疾病复发是非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者接受低强度预处理(RIC)异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后治疗失败的最常见原因。目前尚不清楚在 RIC 平台中将全身照射(TBI)总剂量从 2 增加到 4 Gy 是否可以在不增加无复发生存率(NRM)的情况下提供更好的疾病控制。利用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(CIBMTR)数据库,我们评估了 NHL 患者接受 RIC allo-HCT 的结果,这些患者接受氟达拉滨(Flu)/2 Gy TBI 与 Flu/4 Gy TBI 治疗。在 CIBMTR 登记处,413 名 NHL 成年患者于 2008 年至 2017 年间接受了使用匹配相关或无关供体的首次 allo-HCT,使用含有 Flu/2 Gy TBI(n=349)或 Flu/4 Gy TBI(n=64)的 RIC 方案。主要终点是总生存(OS)。次要终点包括急性(a)和慢性(c)移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)、NRM、复发/进展和无进展生存(PFS)。在基线时,Flu/2 Gy TBI 组的 Karnofsky 表现状态≥90 的患者明显较少,而 HCT 合并症指数较高的患者明显较多。多变量分析显示,2 种预处理队列在 3 级至 4 级 aGVHD 或 cGVHD 的风险方面无显著差异。与 Flu/2 Gy TBI 相比,Flu/4 Gy TBI 预处理与更高的 NRM 风险相关(风险比[HR],1.79;95%置信区间[CI],1.11 至 2.89;P=0.02)和 OS 降低(HR,1.51;95% CI,1.03 至 2.23,P=0.03)。2 种方案之间在复发/进展(HR,0.78;95% CI,0.47 至 1.29,P=0.33)或 PFS(HR,1.09;95% CI,0.78 至 1.54,P=0.61)风险方面无显著差异。与 Flu/2 Gy TBI 相比,Flu/4 Gy TBI 队列的 5 年调整结果为 NRM(28% 与 47%;P=0.005)、复发/进展(35% 与 29%;P=0.28)、PFS(37% 与 24%;P=0.03)和 OS(51% 与 31%;P=0.001)。在这两个队列中,复发是导致死亡的最常见原因。在 NHL 患者接受 Flu/TBI 预处理的情况下,将 TBI 剂量从 2 增加到 4 Gy 与 NRM 增加和 OS 降低相关,而在疾病控制方面没有任何显著获益。在 RIC Flu/TBI 平台中,最佳剂量为 2 Gy 用于淋巴瘤。