Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 12;10(1):4568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61266-x.
Spinal fusion is one of the most common procedures performed in spine surgery. As rates of spinal fusion continue to increase, rates of complications such as nonunions continue to increase as well. Current evidence supporting the use of electrical stimulation to promote fusion is inconclusive. This review aimed to determine if postoperative electrical stimulation is more efficacious than no stimulation or placebo in promoting radiographic fusion in patients undergoing spinal fusion. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, CINAHL and MEDLINE from date of inception to current. Ongoing clinical trials were also identified and reference lists of included studies were manually searched for relevant articles. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Trialists were contacted for any missing or incomplete data. Of 1184 articles screened, 7 studies were eligible for final inclusion (n = 941). A total of 487 patients received postoperative electrical stimulation and 454 patients received control or sham stimulation. All evidence was of moderate quality. Electrical stimulation (pulsed electromagnetic fields, direct current, and capacitive coupling) increased the odds of a successful fusion by 2.5-fold relative to control (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.86 to 3.43, p < 0.00001). A test for subgroup interaction by stimulation type, smoking status, and number of levels fused was not significant (p = 0.93, p = 0.82 and p = 0.65, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis found moderate-quality evidence supporting the use of postoperative electrical stimulation as an adjunct to spinal fusion surgery. Patients treated with electrical stimulation have significantly greater rates of successful fusion. The level of evidence for this study is therapeutic level I.
脊柱融合术是脊柱外科中最常见的手术之一。随着脊柱融合术的应用率不断增加,非融合等并发症的发生率也在不断增加。目前支持使用电刺激促进融合的证据尚无定论。本综述旨在确定脊柱融合术后电刺激是否比不刺激或安慰剂更能促进融合影像学融合。我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 MEDLINE,检索时间从建库到当前。还确定了正在进行的临床试验,并手动检索纳入研究的参考文献列表以查找相关文章。两名评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。使用 Mantel-Haenszel 方法汇总数据。对于任何缺失或不完整的数据,均联系试验人员。在筛选出的 1184 篇文章中,有 7 项研究符合最终纳入标准(n=941)。共有 487 例患者接受了术后电刺激,454 例患者接受了对照或假刺激。所有证据均为中等质量。与对照组相比,电刺激(脉冲电磁场、直流电和电容耦合)使融合成功的几率增加了 2.5 倍(OR=2.53,95%CI 1.86 至 3.43,p<0.00001)。刺激类型、吸烟状况和融合节段数的亚组交互检验无统计学意义(p=0.93、p=0.82 和 p=0.65)。本系统评价和荟萃分析发现,有中等质量证据支持术后电刺激作为脊柱融合术的辅助治疗。接受电刺激治疗的患者融合成功率显著提高。本研究的证据水平为治疗水平 I。