Alkhodairi Asem, Alseweed Mohammad, Alwashmi Sulaiman, Elmoazen Ramy A
College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Quassim, Saudi Arabia.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Dec 13;7(23):4127-4130. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.869. eCollection 2019 Dec 15.
Using of sealant on pits and fissures is likely one of the most generally well-known strategies by the new cavity-prevention systems.
The purpose of this research is to measure the retentiveness of sealants of resin-modified ionomer glass cement (GIC) and resin pits and fissures, on the first permanent molars of special patients as a part of caries prevention program in schools.
The sample was comprised by 60 molars. Resin-based sealants on one side and glass-ionomer sealant on the contralateral side of the mouth. The molars were examined in three and six months after application for retention with three standards: TR: Totally Retained; PR: Partially Retained; and CL: Completely Lost.
by the end of the study 60% of resin sealant was present. While 55% of GIC were retentive after 6 months.
Resin sealants are more retentive than glass ionomer sealants in school-based carries prevention program.
在窝沟使用封闭剂可能是新型防龋系统中最广为人知的策略之一。
本研究的目的是测量树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀（GIC）和树脂窝沟封闭剂在特殊患者第一恒磨牙上的保留率，作为学校龋齿预防计划的一部分。
样本包括60颗磨牙。一侧使用树脂基封闭剂，对侧使用玻璃离子封闭剂。在应用后三个月和六个月检查磨牙的保留情况，有三个标准：TR：完全保留；PR：部分保留；CL：完全脱落。
到研究结束时，树脂封闭剂的留存率为60%。而6个月后GIC的保留率为55%。
在基于学校的龋齿预防计划中，树脂封闭剂比玻璃离子封闭剂的保留性更好。
